Treatment of laundry wastewater by biological and
electrocoagulation methods
Terelle Ramcharan and Ajay Bissessur
ABSTRACT
The present study describes an improvement in the current electrocoagulation treatment process
and focuses on a comparative study for the clean-up of laundry wastewater (LWW) after each wash
and rinse cycle by biological and electrocoagulation treatment methods. For biological treatment, the
wastewater was treated with a Bacillus strain of aerobic bacteria especially suited for the
degradation of fats, lipids, protein, detergents and hydrocarbons. Treatment of the LWW by
electrocoagulation involved the oxidation of aluminium metal upon the application of a controlled
voltage which produces various aluminium hydroxy species capable of adsorbing pollutants from the
wastewater. The efficiency of the clean-up of LWW using each method was assessed by
determination of surfactant concentration, chemical oxygen demand and total dissolved solids. A
rapid decrease in surfactant concentration was noted within 0.5 hour of electrocoagulation, whereas
a notable decrease in the surfactant concentration was observed only after 12 hour of biological
treatment. The rapid generation of aluminium hydroxy species in the electrocoagulation cell allowed
adsorption of pollutants at a faster rate when compared to the aerobic degradation of the surfactant;
hence a reduced period of time is required for treatment of LWW by electrocoagulation.
Terelle Ramcharan
Ajay Bissessur (corresponding author)
School of Chemistry and Physics,
University of KwaZulu-Natal,
Private Bag X54001,
Durban 4000,
South Africa
E-mail: bissessura@ukzn.ac.za
Key words | biological, Biospinners, electrocoagulation, laundry wastewater, linear alkylbenzene
sulphonates
INTRODUCTION
Water is a vital component for the sustainability of life on
earth. With an increase in the world population and urban-
isation, the demand for fresh potable water has escalated
(Marcucci et al. ). This has accelerated the need for
the development of new and more efficient wastewater recy-
cling systems. Laundry wastewater (LWW) can be
considered to be relatively less chemically polluted when
compared to other industrial effluents; hence its purification
and recycling would become pivotal in decreasing the
demand for fresh potable water (Schouten et al. ).
Targeting the development of new and economical treat-
ment methods for LWW should not only be geared toward
efficiency in the recycling ability but also incorporate mini-
mal consumption of chemicals and energy. The typical
composition of LWW consists primarily of the laundry
detergent, inorganic species, minor organic compounds
and dirt removed from soiled items (St Laurent et al.
). The characteristic chemicals found in laundry deter-
gents chiefly include surfactants, builders, bleach and
co-builders. Laundry detergents to a large extent contain a
higher percentage of anionic surfactants and builders in
comparison to other minor ingredients. Sodium dodecylben-
zene sulphonate (SDS) and sodium aluminium silicates
(more commonly known as zeolites) are the most common
anionic surfactants and builders, respectively, utilised in
laundry detergents (Duarte et al. ). The hydrophobic
head and hydrophilic tail of the surfactant ensure effective
removal of most inorganic species from LWW regardless
of its hydrophobic or hydrophilic nature. On the other
hand builders prevent water hardness by exchanging
sodium ions with smaller cations such as magnesium and
calcium. For the implementation of the recycling of LWW
it is imperative to routinely monitor and analyse the surfac-
tant level, as this is the major component of the detergent’s
ingredients and is indicative of its efficacy in the removal of
dirt. Most laundering facilities require a single wash cycle
and two rinse cycles for the effective cleaning of soiled
items. The sampling and purification of LWW after the
84 © IWA Publishing 2017 Water Science & Technology | 75.1 | 2017
doi: 10.2166/wst.2016.464
Downloaded from https://iwaponline.com/wst/article-pdf/75/1/84/456517/wst075010084.pdf
by guest
on 01 November 2018