Applied Vegetation Science && (2015)
Ecological disturbance regimes caused by agricultural
land uses and their effects on tropical forest
regeneration
Isela Zerme~ no-Hern andez, Mois es M endez-Toribio, Christina Siebe, Julieta Ben ıtez-Malvido
& Miguel Mart ınez-Ramos
Keywords
Forest recovery; Mexico; Old-fields; Selva
Lacandona; Succession; Tropical rain forest
Nomenclature
Tropicos.org. Missouri Botanical Garden.
26 Jan 2015 (http://www.tropicos.org)
Received 16 June 2014
Accepted 16 December 2014
Co-ordinating Editor: Norbert H€ olzel
Zerme~ no-Hern andez, I. (corresponding
author, izermeno@cieco.unam.mx, )
1
M endez-Toribio, M.
(mendeztm@comunidad.unam.mx)
1
Siebe, C. (siebe@unam.mx)
2
Ben ıtez-Malvido, J.
(jbenitez@cieco.unam.mx)
1
&
Mart ınez-Ramos, M.
(mmartinez@cieco.unam.mx)
1
1
Centro de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas,
Universidad Nacional Aut onoma de M exico,
Antigua Carretera a P atzcuaro No. 8701,
Ex-Hacienda de San Jos e de la Huerta, C.P.
58190 Morelia, Michoac an, Mexico;
2
Instituto de Geolog ıa, Universidad Nacional
Aut onoma de M exico, Ciudad Universitaria,
C.P. 04510 Ciudad de M exico, DF, M exico
Abstract
Aims: Across tropical regions, large forest areas have been converted to different
agricultural land uses. These uses impose ecological disturbances affecting forest
regeneration potential after field abandonment. Finding ways to identify those
agricultural land uses limiting forest regeneration is a critical issue for conserving
biodiversity in human-modified landscapes. Here, we developed a fast and inex-
pensive index, useful for quantifying ecological disturbance regimes associated
with agricultural land uses, and tested its power to predict forest regeneration
potential.
Location: Municipality of Marqu es de Comillas, southeast Mexico.
Methods: Interviews were conducted with local farmers to quantify distur-
bance components (size, duration and severity) associated with agricultural land
uses. The scaled values of these disturbance components were added in a simple
ecological disturbance index (EDI). In each one of nine recently abandoned
fields representing a wide range of EDI values, two 10-m
2
plots, one close to and
one far from nearby forest remnants, were established. On each plot, all woody
plants of 10–100 m in height were counted, identified and measured in four 1-
m
2
subplots, at the time of field abandonment and 2 yr later. In addition, at each
plot, 18 site condition (microclimate and soil) attributes were quantified at the
time of abandonment. Plant density, biomass, species richness and species diver-
sity were used as regeneration variables, and EDI and site condition attributes as
independent ones.
Results: Two years after abandonment, most regeneration variables declined
exponentially with EDI. Biomass was not explained by EDI but changed posi-
tively with light availability. EDI was strongly correlated to vapour pressure defi-
cit, which also predicted regeneration potential (except biomass).
Conclusions: EDI is a cheap and easy tool for quantifying the ecological distur-
bance produced by a wide range of agricultural land uses. The index predicted
several regeneration variables as well as or better than direct measurements of
the site condition at the time of abandonment. EDI can be used to identify biodi-
versity-friendly agricultural land uses in human-modified landscapes.
Introduction
Over past decades tropical forests have suffered extensive
and rapid deforestation because of their conversion to agri-
cultural systems (FAO 2009). A variety of agricultural land
uses are practised in the tropics, ranging from traditional
small-scale shifting cultivation to large-scale conventional
agriculture, such as sugar cane and eucalypt plantations,
cattle pastures and soybean fields. Agricultural land uses
can be considered ecological disturbance regimes (sensu
Pickett & White 1985) with the potential to affect the
speed and extent of forest regeneration in abandoned
fields (Guariguata & Ostertag 2001; Myster 2004; Chazdon
et al. 2009). Hence, the biodiversity conservation in
1
Applied Vegetation Science
Doi: 10.1111/avsc.12161 © 2015 International Association for Vegetation Science