A numerical-experimental investigation on the aerodynamic performance of
CAARC building models with geometric modifications
G.W. Alminhana
*
, A.L. Braun, A.M. Loredo-Souza
Graduate Program in Civil Engineering (PPGEC), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Av. Osvaldo Aranha, 99 – 3
floor, Porto Alegre, RS, CEP: 90035-
190, Brazil
ARTICLE INFO
Keywords:
Wind engineering
Building aerodynamics
Wind tunnel
Finite element method (FEM)
Large eddy simulation (LES)
ABSTRACT
This paper presents the results of a numerical-experimental investigation carried out with the purpose to evaluate
the aerodynamic performance of CAARC tall building models with different cross-section configurations. A nu-
merical model based on the Taylor-Galerkin two-step scheme and the Finite Element Method is adopted. Tur-
bulence is described using LES and a synthetic inflow turbulence generator. Experimental tests were performed at
the Prof. Joaquim Blessmann Boundary Layer Wind Tunnel considering CAARC tall building models with cross-
section modifications based on chamfered and recessed corners. Some of the wind tunnel predictions obtained
here are compared with results obtained from the numerical model proposed in this work, where two and three-
dimensional meshes are utilized. Comparisons are also performed considering results obtained from other authors
in similar studies. From the present investigation, it was observed that the wind action on tall buildings is
significantly influenced by the geometric configuration of the building corners, which may lead to important
reductions in the aerodynamic forces. Through a direct comparison of results between numerical and experi-
mental simulation, we can see that both reach a convergence of results, thus indicating the potential of use of CFD
in the modern aerodynamic investigation of buildings.
1. Introduction
The CAARC standard tall building model is an experimental building
prototype presenting a simple hexahedral geometry with right-angle
corners, which has been widely utilized to calibrate experimental
methodologies in wind tunnel tests. Nevertheless, it is well known that
certain geometric configurations of building corners can improve the
aerodynamic performance of tall buildings by reducing the magnitude of
drag and lift forces acting on the building surface. Hence, shape opti-
mization is a major topic in building aerodynamics, where the shape of
the cross-section plays an important role. In this sense, a numerical-
experimental investigation is proposed in this work in order to eval-
uate the aerodynamic behavior of tall building models based on the
CAARC geometry with corner modifications.
One of the first studies dedicated to wind action on the CAARC
building model is due to Wardlaw and Moss (1970), where extensive
experimental tests were performed. Later, Melbourne (1980) compared
predictions obtained from six different wind tunnel devices to evaluate
the reliability of the corresponding experimental data. Whitbread (1975)
obtained the aerodynamic coefficients for the CAARC building model
using experimental tests in a wind tunnel and Obasaju (1992) determined
experimentally the overturning moments and forces referring to a
CAARC model considering different incidence angles and different
boundary layer profiles. The action of natural winds on the CAARC
building model was analyzed by authors such as Tang and Kwok (2004),
Chen and Letchford (2004) and Balendra et al. (2005), who also inves-
tigated winds under extreme conditions. The influence of geometric
configuration over the aerodynamic efficiency of tall buildings was
pointed out by Baker (2007) and Xie (2014).
In the field of aerodynamic optimization of buildings, one can observe
that significant improvements can be obtained by simply modifying the
cross-section configuration slightly. In this sense, it is well known that the
shape of the building corners has noticeable influence on the magnitude
of aerodynamic forces acting on the building surface. Davenport (1971)
is one of the first authors to investigate aspects of aerodynamic optimi-
zation applied to buildings, where different geometric configurations
were analyzed. He concluded that buildings with circular cross-section
behave better in terms of aerodynamic efficiency, followed by build-
ings with rectangular shape with modified corners. Effects of the corner
shape over the flow field around building models were also studied by
* Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses: guilherme.alminhana@ufrgs.br (G.W. Alminhana), alexandre.braun@ufrgs.br (A.L. Braun), acir@ufrgs.br (A.M. Loredo-Souza).
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jweia
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2018.07.001
Received 18 September 2017; Received in revised form 13 March 2018; Accepted 1 July 2018
0167-6105/© 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics 180 (2018) 34–48