Asian Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities Vol. 3(3) August 2014                      ISSN: 2186-8492, ISSN: 2186-8484 Print www.ajssh.leena-luna.co.jp Leena and Luna International, Oyama, Japan. Copyright © 2014 リナアンドルナインターナショナル小山市、日本 Page| 164 Constitutional and Political Heritage of Pakistan: An Analysis in Democratic Perspective Muhammad Rizwan 1 , Qazi Sultan Mehmood 2 , Sidra Sabir 3 , Muhammad Waqar 4 , Muhammad Arshid 5 1-2 Department of Pakistan Studies, 4-5 Department of Political Science, Hazara University, Mansehra, 2 Department of Pakistan Studies, Hazara University, Havellian Campus, PAKISTAN. 1 drmuhammadrizwan_hu@yahoo.com, 4 waqar.peace@gmail.com ABSTRACT To understand the nature and functioning of democracy in Pakistan, it is important to trace the evolution of representative government in Indian sub-continent during the Colonial era. With the fall of great Mughal Empire in India, the British Crown successfully established the colonial authority in order to fill the power vacuum. Although at that time democratic government was effectively functioning in England, however, being a colonial power they intentionally avoided to launch a full-scale democracy in India, because introduction of democracy would meant a rule of locals with a little place for foreigners. However, with the passage of time elected institutions were introduced at central and provincial level yet ultimate power remained in the hands of official administrators. Extraordinary powers lied with the institutions of military and civil bureaucracy whereas feudalism remained an important pillar of colonial government. In point of fact, feudal class, on most of the occasions, helped the colonial state to strengthen its control and exercised through civil bureaucracy over the vast rural areas. This paper is an attempt to analyze these aspects of colonial government and their impact on political system of Pakistan. Keywords: Colonial legacy, civil bureaucracy, democratic process, feudalism, Pakistan INTRODUCTION Pakistan inherited the state institutions that had evolved during the course of more than a century of British colonial rule. In this perspective, it is important to trace evolution and growth of system of representative government in colonial South Asia, because it exerted considerable influence on political dynamics of post-partition Pakistan (Syed, 1995 p 110). According to the political analyst, Mohammad Waseem (1993), “most of the problems of electoral democracy in Pakistan have their roots in institutional and constitutional nature of the state system which it inherited from the colonial period”. Political structure of the Muslim rule in India was mainly a monarchical and non-democratic. They knew that it is not possible for them to introduce a democratic system based on the concept of majority rule in a country where they have formulated a marginal representation not enough to maintain their hold on the governmental affairs. While explaining the nature and functioning of the government of Muslim empire during the period of “Ghiyasuddin BalbanK. Ali (1985) writes, “he was absolute in all affairs of the state and there was no check on his powers. His government was no doubt a highly organized dictatorship”. Succeeding Muslim rulers followed the same pattern of the government. Similarly, Robert L. Hardgrave thinks that British rule started in 1857, introduced a system of government which