Copyright © 2017 American Scientific Publishers All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America RESEARCH ARTICLE Advanced Science Letters Vol. 23, 5977–5979, 2017 Packed and Monolithic Reactors for the Dry Reforming of Methane: Ni Supported on -Al 2 O 3 Promoted by Ru I. Luisetto 1* , C. Sarno 2 , D. De Felicis 3 , F. Basoli 4 , C. Battocchio 1 , S. Tuti 1 , E. Bemporad 3 , S. Licoccia 2 , and E. Di Bartolomeo 2 1 Department of Sciences, “Roma Tre” University, Via della Vasca Navale 79, 00146 Rome, Italy 2 Department of Chem. Sci. and Technologies, “Tor Vergata” University, Via della Ricerca Scientifica, 00133 Rome, Italy 3 Department of Engineering, “Roma Tre” University, Via della Vasca Navale 79, 00146 Rome, Italy 4 Department of Engineering, “Campus Bio-Medico di Roma” University, Via Álvaro del Portillo 21, 00128 Rome, Italy The Dry reforming of methane (DRM) is as an efficient way for CH 4 and CO 2 valorisation because the produced syn-gas has an H 2 /CO ratio equal to that suitable for the synthesis of oxygenated hydrocarbons and synthetic fuels. The development of Ni (10 wt%) based structured and unstructured catalysts promoted by a small amount of Ru (0.5 wt%) has been investigated. Unstructured catalysts were prepared by wet impregnation method and a combination of wash coating-wet impregnation methods was used for cordierite monoliths. Ru promoted catalyst (Ni–Ru) was remarkable active showing higher reactant conversions and H 2 /CO ratio compared with Ni catalyst. Ni–Ru monolith was initially much more active than monometallic Ni stating the positive effect of Ru on maintaining Ni reduced. Reaching steady state condition, Ni rapidly deactivated due to carbon formation, whereas Ni–Ru monolith remained stable confirming that Ru behaves as an efficient and cheap promoter of Ni for DRM. Keywords: Ni/Al 2 O 3 , NiRu/Al 2 O 3 , Structured Catalyst, Dry Reforming of Methane, Carbon Deposition. 1. INTRODUCTION The CO 2 reforming of CH 4 (Eq. (1)) or dry reforming (DRM) is as an efficient way of recycling two greenhouse gases to syn-gas. 1 CH 4 + CO 2 2H 2 + 2CO H 0 298 K = 247 kJmol -1 (1) To date, the DRM industrial implementation is mainly impeded by catalyst deactivation and/or reactor plugging due to the methane cracking (Eq. (2)). CH 4 C + 2H 2 H 0 298 K = 75 kJmol -1 (2) Therefore, there is a pressing need to increase the catalysts resistance toward carbon deposition, one mean being the use of noble metal, such as Pt, Ru and Rh, supported on various oxides. 2 Among bimetallic systems, best performances are shown by those containing a small amount (<1 wt%) of precious metals keeping the catalyst cost sufficiently low for industrial imple- mentation. Ruthenium is the cheapest precious metal and for this * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. reason can be the ideal choice as a promoter. Ni–Ru catalysts have been studied for the DRM reaction 3 showing very good cat- alytic activity and stability due to an increased Ni dispersion. As yet, it has not been completely clarified if the effect of Ru is to promote the formation of Ni–Ru alloys or to favour Ni disper- sion. Moreover, being the solubility between Ni and Ru metals quite limited, some authors claim a very low Ni sintering resis- tance by Ru addition. 4 Beside the definition of the catalyst proper characteristics, it is also important to fulfil the demands arising from industrial production and process intensification. For this purpose, the use of micro-structured catalysts can offer several advantages over conventional packed bed reactors: increase of mass and heat transfer, lower pressure drop, larger surface-to- volume ratio and compact reactor design. 5 In the present work we investigated the effect of a small amount of Ru (0.5 wt%) on the catalytic activity and stability toward carbon deposition and Ni oxidation of Ni/-Al 2 O 3 catalysts for the DRM reac- tion. Ni and Ni–Ru based catalysts were studied in both powder and structured forms. Cordierite monolith was selected because of its chemical stability and thermal compatibility with alumina catalyst. Adv. Sci. Lett. Vol. 23, No. 6, 2017 1936-6612/2017/23/5977/003 doi:10.1166/asl.2017.9085 5977