196 J ENDOVASC THER 2005;12:196–199 2005 by the INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ENDOVASCULAR SPECIALISTS Available at www.jevt.org CLINICAL INVESTIGATION Three-Dimensional Teleradiology for Surveillance Following Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Feasibility Study Jon H. Kaspersen, PhD 1 ; Jenny Aasland, RN 2 ; Ha ˚ kon O. Leira, MD 3 ; Asbjørn Ødega ˚ rd, MD 3 ; Bjørn Nagelhus, MD 4 ; Gunnar Størset, MD 5 ; Jan Lundbom, MD, PhD 2 ; Thomas T. Rosenlund, MSc 6 ; Aksel Tjora, MSc, PhD 6 ; and Hans O. Myhre, MD, PhD 2 1 SINTEF Health Research, Trondheim, Norway. Departments of 2 Surgery and 3 Radiology, St. Olav’s Hospital, University Hospital of Trondheim, Norway. 4 Department of Radiology, Levanger Hospital, Levanger, Norway. 5 Department of Radiology, Molde Hospital, Molde, Norway. 6 Department of Sociology and Political Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway. Purpose: To study the feasibility of 3-dimensional (3D) teleradiology in surveillance of pa- tients treated with stent-grafts for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Methods: Between April 2002 and November 2003, 8 AAA patients (7 men; median age 73 years, range 62–84) with stent-grafts had follow-up computed tomograms (CT) per- formed at their local hospital and transmitted without loss across a broadband connection to the university hospital. On both monitors, the radiologists were presented with the complete CT axial dataset, sagittal and coronal reformatted slices, and a 3D volume-ren- dered reconstruction. The two radiologists were then able to simultaneously perform mea- surements and real-time manipulations of the axial and 3D pictures, which were discussed over the telephone or using a videoconferencing unit. Patient satisfaction, the radiologists’ evaluation of the method, and the potential cost savings were explored. Results: Twelve follow-up CT scans were performed on the 8 patients. The time for trans- mission over the teleradiological network averaged 5 minutes, and the evaluation required 15 minutes at the university hospital. The overall technical quality of the images was rated as good by the university radiologist. In 11 studies, the stent-grafts were satisfactory, but a type III endoleak was detected in one 5.5-year-old stent-graft. Neither radiologist had a problem identifying the endoleak. Patients had confidence that the examination at the local hospital was of good quality; they all felt that they received good care and were pleased with avoiding travel to the university hospital. From the economic analysis, an annual savings of 40,000 Euros (US$52,304) was projected, mostly due to avoiding hospital stays and outpatient consultations at the university hospital. Conclusions: The experiences from this study are encouraging, but a larger series will be necessary for a thorough evaluation of 3D teleradiology as a surveillance method for aortic stent-graft patients. J Endovasc Ther 2005;12:196–199 This work was supported by The Research Council of Norway and a grant from St. Olavs Hospital, University Hospital of Trondheim (1401 1023 4630), Norway. Address for correspondence and reprints: Hans Olav Myhre, MD, Department of Surgery, St. Olav’s Hospital, University Hospital of Trondheim, N-7006 Trondheim, Norway. Fax: 47-7386-7428; E-mail: hans.myhre@medisin.ntnu.no