Fuel cells for carbon capture and power generation: Simulation studies Remston Martis a , Amani Al-Othman a , Malek Alkasrawi b , Muhammad Tawalbeh c,* a Department of Chemical Engineering, American University of Sharjah, PO Box 26666, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates b Department of PS & Chemical Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Stevens Point, USA c Sustainable and Renewable Energy Engineering Department, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates highlights Propane and Ethane fueled decarbonization process is simulated using ASPEN HYSYS. The process contains carbon and hydrogen fuel cells ran at various temperatures. This process is intended for power production and full carbon capture. Sensitivity results showed that using propane as a fuel would be feasible. article info Article history: Received 15 February 2020 Received in revised form 8 September 2020 Accepted 22 October 2020 Available online xxx Keywords: Direct carbon fuel cells Hydrocarbon fuels Decarbonization Carbon capture ASPEN HYSYS Sensitivity analysis abstract The decarbonization of hydrocarbons is explored in this work as a method to produce hydrogen and mitigate carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions. An integrated process for power generation and carbon capture based on a hydrocarbon fueled-decarbonization unit was proposed and simulated. Ethane and propane were used as fuels and subjected to the thermal decomposition (decarbonization) process. The system is also composed of a car- bon fuel cell (CFC) and hydrogen fuel cell (HFC) for the production of power and a pure CO 2 stream that is ready for sequestration. The HFC is a high-temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cell operating at 200 C. Simulations were performed using ASPEN HYSYS V.10 for the entire process including the CFC and HFC being operated at various operating temperatures (200e800 C). The power output from the CFC and the HFC as well as the overall process efficiency were calculated. The model incorporates an energy recovery system by adopting a counter-current shell and tube heat exchangers and a turbine. The water produced from the fuel cell system can be utilized in the plant to recover the heat from the furnace. The results showed a 100% carbon capture with a nominal plant capacity of 108 MWe produced when propane fuel was fed to the decarbonizer. The CFC theoretical efficiency is 100% and the practical efficiency was taken as 70% when all internal polari- zations were considered. The results showed that, in the case of propane, the CFC power output was 89 MWe when the CFC operated at 650 C, and the HFC power output was around 45 MWe at 200 C with an overall actual plant efficiency of 35% and 100% carbon capture. Sensitivity analysis recommends a hydrocarbon fuel cost of 0.011 $/kW as the most feasible option. The results reported here on the decarbonization of hydrocarbon fuels are promising toward the direct production of hydrogen with full carbon dioxide sequestration at a potentially lower cost especially in rural areas. The overall actual * Corresponding author. E-mail addresses: mtawalbeh@sharjah.ac.ae, mtawa050@uottawa.ca (M. Tawalbeh). Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/he international journal of hydrogen energy xxx (xxxx) xxx https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.208 0360-3199/© 2020 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Please cite this article as: Martis R et al., Fuel cells for carbon capture and power generation: Simulation studies, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.208