Fuel cells for carbon capture and power generation:
Simulation studies
Remston Martis
a
, Amani Al-Othman
a
, Malek Alkasrawi
b
,
Muhammad Tawalbeh
c,*
a
Department of Chemical Engineering, American University of Sharjah, PO Box 26666, Sharjah, United Arab
Emirates
b
Department of PS & Chemical Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Stevens Point, USA
c
Sustainable and Renewable Energy Engineering Department, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
highlights
Propane and Ethane fueled decarbonization process is simulated using ASPEN HYSYS.
The process contains carbon and hydrogen fuel cells ran at various temperatures.
This process is intended for power production and full carbon capture.
Sensitivity results showed that using propane as a fuel would be feasible.
article info
Article history:
Received 15 February 2020
Received in revised form
8 September 2020
Accepted 22 October 2020
Available online xxx
Keywords:
Direct carbon fuel cells
Hydrocarbon fuels
Decarbonization
Carbon capture
ASPEN HYSYS
Sensitivity analysis
abstract
The decarbonization of hydrocarbons is explored in this work as a method to produce
hydrogen and mitigate carbon dioxide (CO
2
) emissions. An integrated process for power
generation and carbon capture based on a hydrocarbon fueled-decarbonization unit was
proposed and simulated. Ethane and propane were used as fuels and subjected to the
thermal decomposition (decarbonization) process. The system is also composed of a car-
bon fuel cell (CFC) and hydrogen fuel cell (HFC) for the production of power and a pure CO
2
stream that is ready for sequestration. The HFC is a high-temperature proton exchange
membrane fuel cell operating at 200
C. Simulations were performed using ASPEN HYSYS
V.10 for the entire process including the CFC and HFC being operated at various operating
temperatures (200e800
C). The power output from the CFC and the HFC as well as the
overall process efficiency were calculated. The model incorporates an energy recovery
system by adopting a counter-current shell and tube heat exchangers and a turbine. The
water produced from the fuel cell system can be utilized in the plant to recover the heat
from the furnace. The results showed a 100% carbon capture with a nominal plant capacity
of 108 MWe produced when propane fuel was fed to the decarbonizer. The CFC theoretical
efficiency is 100% and the practical efficiency was taken as 70% when all internal polari-
zations were considered. The results showed that, in the case of propane, the CFC power
output was 89 MWe when the CFC operated at 650
C, and the HFC power output was
around 45 MWe at 200
C with an overall actual plant efficiency of 35% and 100% carbon
capture. Sensitivity analysis recommends a hydrocarbon fuel cost of 0.011 $/kW as the
most feasible option. The results reported here on the decarbonization of hydrocarbon
fuels are promising toward the direct production of hydrogen with full carbon dioxide
sequestration at a potentially lower cost especially in rural areas. The overall actual
* Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses: mtawalbeh@sharjah.ac.ae, mtawa050@uottawa.ca (M. Tawalbeh).
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
ScienceDirect
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/he
international journal of hydrogen energy xxx (xxxx) xxx
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.208
0360-3199/© 2020 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Please cite this article as: Martis R et al., Fuel cells for carbon capture and power generation: Simulation studies, International Journal of
Hydrogen Energy, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.208