dental materials 25 ( 2 0 0 9 ) 1221–1229
available at www.sciencedirect.com
journal homepage: www.intl.elsevierhealth.com/journals/dema
Micro-XRD and temperature-modulated DSC investigation
of nickel–titanium rotary endodontic instruments
Satish B. Alapati
a,1
, William A. Brantley
b,∗
, Masahiro Iijima
c
, Scott R. Schricker
b
,
John M. Nusstein
d
, Uei-Ming Li
e
, Timothy A. Svec
f
a
Formerly Department of Materials Science, College of Dental Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
b
Division of Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Mailbox #191, PO Box 182357,
305 West 12th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43218-2357, USA
c
Division of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Department of Oral Growth and Development, School of Dentistry, Health
Sciences University of Hokkaido, Ishikari-Tobetsu, Japan
d
Division of Endodontics, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
e
College of Medicine, National Taiwan University and Cardinal Tien Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
f
Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
article info
Article history:
Received 8 November 2008
Received in revised form
10 April 2009
Accepted 20 April 2009
Keywords:
Nickel–titanium
Endodontics
Rotary instrument
X-ray diffraction
Differential scanning calorimetry
Heat treatment
Phase transformation
Wrought alloys
Metallurgy
Superelasticity
abstract
Objectives. Employ Micro-X-ray diffraction and temperature-modulated differential scanning
calorimetry to investigate microstructural phases, phase transformations, and effects of
heat treatment for rotary nickel–titanium instruments.
Methods. Representative as-received and clinically used ProFile GT and ProTaper instruments
were principally studied. Micro-XRD analyses (Cu K X-rays) were performed at 25
◦
C on
areas of approximately 50 m diameter near the tip and up to 9 mm from the tip. TMDSC
analyses were performed from -80 to 100
◦
C and back to -80
◦
C on segments cut from instru-
ments, using a linear heating and cooling rate of 2
◦
C/min, sinusoidal oscillation of 0.318
◦
C,
and period of 60 s. Instruments were also heat treated 15 min in a nitrogen atmosphere at
400, 500, 600 and 850
◦
C, and analyzed.
Results. At all Micro-XRD analysis regions the strongest peak occurred near 42
◦
, indicat-
ing that instruments were mostly austenite, with perhaps some R-phase and martensite.
Tip and adjacent regions had smallest peak intensities, indicative of greater work hard-
ening, and the intensity at other sites depended on the instrument. TMDSC heating and
cooling curves had single peaks for transformations between martensite and austenite.
Austenite-finish (A
f
) temperatures and enthalpy changes were similar for as-received and
used instruments. Heat treatments at 400, 500 and 600
◦
C raised the A
f
temperature to
45–50
◦
C, and heat treatment at 850
◦
C caused drastic changes in transformation behavior.
Significance. Micro-XRD provides novel information about NiTi phases at different positions
on instruments. TMDSC indicates that heat treatment might yield instruments with sub-
stantial martensite and improved clinical performance.
© 2009 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Based upon a portion of a dissertation submitted by the first author to the Graduate School of The Ohio State University, in partial
fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy.
∗
Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 614 292 0773; fax: +1 614 292 9422.
E-mail addresses: wbrantle@columbus.rr.com, brantley.1@osu.edu (W.A. Brantley).
1
Present address: Department of Endodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
0109-5641/$ – see front matter © 2009 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.dental.2009.04.010