EFFECTS OF CONCHING TIME AND INGREDIENTS ON PREFERENCE OF MILK CHOCOLATE M. PRAWIRA and S.A. BARRINGER 1 Department of Food Science and Technology The Ohio State University Columbus, OH Accepted for Publication May 21, 2008 ABSTRACT The objective of this study is to determine how the conching time and the quantity of sucrose, lecithin, cocoa butter and whole milk powder affect consumer preference for milk chocolate. Untrained panelists performed a sensory study consisting of acceptability, preference and attribute intensity. Longer conching time produced significantly smoother chocolate with smaller particle size. The longest conche times had the smallest particle size and were the most mouthcoating. There was no change in flavor with conching. The longer conche times were preferred. Panelists preferred higher sucrose levels, and increasing sucrose decreased bitterness and increased chocolate flavor. Increasing lecithin increased smoothness, but less lecithin was preferred, possibly due to off-flavors at high levels of lecithin. Increasing cocoa butter yielded softer chocolate but did not affect bitterness. Panelists preferred 10% over higher levels of cocoa butter. More milk powder produced smoother chocolate with more caramel flavor and was preferred. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS The perceived quality of milk chocolate is affected by conching time, sucrose, lecithin, cocoa butter and whole milk powder. Texture was affected the most by conching, milk powder, lecithin and cocoa butter. Flavor was affected the most by milk powder and sugar. The only variable that did not affect acceptability and preference of milk chocolate was time for under- conched samples. While this study did not determine the optimum conditions for milk chocolate, the most preferred and/or acceptable samples were 1 Corresponding author. Department of Food Science and Technology, The Ohio State University, 2015 Fyffe Road, Columbus 43210, OH. TEL: 614-688-3642; FAX: 614-292-0218; EMAIL: barringer.11@osu.edu Journal of Food Processing and Preservation 33 (2009) 571–589. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-4549.2008.00272.x 571 © 2009 The Author(s) Journal compilation © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.