Research Article A Study on Risk and Expense Evaluation of Agility Supply Management of Machinery Mohammad Heydari 1 and Kin Keung Lai 2 1 School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China 2 College of Economics, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China Correspondence should be addressed to Kin Keung Lai; mskklai@outlook.com Received 4 November 2019; Revised 15 February 2020; Accepted 2 May 2020; Published 19 May 2020 Academic Editor: Xiaohua Ding Copyright©2020MohammadHeydariandKinKeungLai.isisanopenaccessarticledistributedundertheCreativeCommons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. We provide a technical assessment and critique of the existing literature via highlighting problems associated with conceptualization and technical improvement of agility practices. By presenting a narrative evaluation of the technical review, we underscore the nature of the SC hazard in addition to agility practices and furnish a synthesis for future studies. e purpose is to examine the relationship between identifying and ranking the elements affecting supply management for SC agility in compressed natural gas pressure vessels. is study is applied research and data are collected based on descriptive survey. e populace of the investigation is milled compressed natural gas pressure vessels. Survey data are amassed through interviews and questionnaires. Cronbach’s alpha has been utilized to evaluate the reliability of the values received 0.778, which shows that the questionnaire is of excellent reliability and the questionnaire has 27 questions. Also, because the volume of the statistical population is 270 people, the consequences show that there is a positive connection among the empowerment of SC agility. Driving agility is on a positive supply chain (SC) agility. e expense has a poagilitysitive impact on SC agility. 1. Introduction A successful strategic decision offers the right move for the exact markets at the exact time. SWOT evaluation is a commonly utilized tool that tests the strengths and weak- nesses of an organisation or industry along via occasions and threats in the market environment. e SWOT frame offers primary definitions for evaluating the performance of se- lected positions. In this study, without assigning significant rankings to the SWOT elements, we suggest to decorate the SWOT evaluation with MCDM strategies known as AHP and ANP. e AHP algorithm compares priorities between elements or requirements to prioritise each level of the hierarchy by computing eigenvalues. In addition, for the AHP, the ANP algorithm is a common form that allows for interdependencies, exterior dependencies, and feedback between the determinants of hierarchical or nonhierarchical structures. e main reason for current article is to describe how AHP and ANP strategies are used to prioritise and evaluate SWOT factors. Increased rivalry in the decade 1990 organisations will have to enhance the efficiency in many factors of its business. at is why industry leaders have realized that it is now not adequate merely to produce a quality product; however, additionally, to supply products in accordance with the demands of the customer (when, where, and how), the quality and expense are cared for. In such circumstances, located organisations have to manage the units that provide inputs as well as delivery and after-sales service centres linked to the product to the customer and pay. Today’s worldwide business environment is charac- terised via a short product life cycle, worrisome consumer needs, and varying provide link hazards. In this envi- ronment, organisations are looking for new ways to deal with hazards and provide better link performance. Many transactions are characterised by the universal technique Hindawi Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society Volume 2020, Article ID 7030642, 19 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7030642