pharmaceutics
Article
Assessment of Vehicle Volatility and Deposition Layer
Thickness in Skin Penetration Models
Abdullah Hamadeh
1
, John Troutman
2
and Andrea N. Edginton
1,
*
Citation: Hamadeh, A.; Troutman, J.;
Edginton, A.N. Assessment of Vehicle
Volatility and Deposition Layer
Thickness in Skin Penetration Models.
Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 807.
https://doi.org/10.3390/
pharmaceutics13060807
Academic Editors: Heather Benson
and Maria Camilla Bergonzi
Received: 8 April 2021
Accepted: 24 May 2021
Published: 28 May 2021
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral
with regard to jurisdictional claims in
published maps and institutional affil-
iations.
Copyright: © 2021 by the authors.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
4.0/).
1
School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Kitchener, ON N2G 1C5, Canada; ahamadeh@uwaterloo.ca
2
The Procter & Gamble Company, Mason, OH 45040, USA; troutman.ja@pg.com
* Correspondence: aedginto@uwaterloo.ca
Abstract: Systemic disposition of dermally applied chemicals is often formulation-dependent.
Rapid evaporation of the vehicle can result in crystallization of active compounds, limiting their
degree of skin penetration. In addition, the choice of vehicle can affect the permeant’s degree of
penetration into the stratum corneum. The aim of this study is to build a predictive, mechanistic,
dermal absorption model that accounts for vehicle-specific effects on the kinetics of permeant trans-
port into skin. An existing skin penetration model is extended to explicitly include the effect of
vehicle volatility over time. Using in vitro measurements of skin penetration by chemicals applied
in both a saline and an ethanol solvent, the model is optimized to learn two vehicle-specific quan-
tities: the solvent evaporation rate and the extent of permeant deposition into the upper stratum
corneum immediately following application. The dermal disposition estimates of the trained model
are subsequently compared against those of the original model using further in vitro measurements.
The trained model showed a 1.5-fold improvement and a 19-fold improvement in overall goodness
of fit among compounds tested in saline and ethanol solvents, respectively. The proposed model
structure can thus form a basis for in vitro to in vivo extrapolations of dermal disposition for skin
formulations containing volatile components.
Keywords: dermal; skin; permeation; in silico; models; vehicle; volatility
1. Introduction
Establishing reliable estimates of the bioavailability of dermally applied chemicals
is a requirement for efficacy and risk assessment studies and for subsequent regulatory
approval. Bioavailability may be inferred by training an in silico model of dermal absorp-
tion using in vitro skin permeation test data and then extrapolating the trained model to
predict the disposition of actives in the in vivo setting [1]. The reliability of such model-
based approaches, however, depends on a quantitative understanding of the processes that
ultimately determine dermal absorption.
Following application of a dose preparation to the skin surface, the formulation com-
ponents begin to undergo a series of transport processes: (1) a fraction of the applied
dose on the skin surface permeates into a ‘deposition layer’ occupying the upper stratum
corneum (SC) through a process of convection [2], (2) the concentration difference between
the vehicle and the top layers of the SC drives diffusion of the permeant [3], and, (3) de-
pending on exposure and ambient conditions, volatile components of the formulation may
evaporate. While evaporation of the solvent can concentrate active ingredients near the
skin surface, accelerating absorption, the eventual precipitation of active ingredients on the
skin surface can inhibit their diffusive flux into the SC [4–7]. The time scales over which
these processes occur have significant bearing on the degree of cumulative skin penetration
and, importantly, are often formulation-dependent [8].
In the earlier modeling work reported in Dancik et al. [9], the vehicle/stratum corneum
boundary conditions of Kasting and Miller [2,10] were integrated with the skin layer
partitioning, diffusion and clearance models reported in [11–14]. Among the assumptions
Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 807. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13060807 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/pharmaceutics