Corrigendum Corrigendum to ‘‘Fuzzy probability based fault tree analysis to propagate and quantify epistemic uncertainty” [Ann. Nucl. Energy 85 (2015) 1189– 1199] Julwan Hendry Purba ⇑ , D.T. Sony Tjahyani, Andi Sofrany Ekariansyah, Hendro Tjahjono Center for Nuclear Reactor Technology and Safety, National Nuclear Energy Agency of Indonesia (BATAN), Gd. 80 Kawasan Puspiptek Setu, Tangerang Selatan, Banten 15310, Indonesia The authors wish to make the following corrections in the pub- lished paper mentioned above: 1. In Step 4 on page 1196, the number of minimal cut sets whose fuzzy probabilities need to be generated is incorrect. The correct number is 24, hence the equation should be corrected from MCS ¼fmcs i i ¼ 1; 2; ÁÁÁ 23 j g into MCS ¼fmcs i i ¼ 1; 2; ÁÁÁ 24 j g 2. In Step 5 on page 1196–1197, the minimal cut set, which is used in the calculation example, should be changed from mcs 3 into mcs 4 . The involved basic events, the calculation processes and the results do not change. 3. In Table 7 on page 1197, all minimal cut sets should be dropped one row down and a new minimal cut set, which is CE1-RYT- CF-TR2OF4, should be inserted into the first row. Therefore, there are 24 minimal cut sets in Table 7 and, hence, Table 7 should be corrected into: 4. In Step 6 on page 1197, the number of minimal cut sets used to generate the best estimate, the lower bound and the upper bound fuzzy probabilities of the top event should be corrected from 23 into 24. The calculations and the results do not change. 5. On page 1198, another row for mcs 24 should be added as the last row of Table 8. Therefore, the corrected Table 8 is However, the above corrections do not change the calculations and the results of the study reported in the paper. The conclusion of the paper also does not change. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2017.05.043 0306-4549/Ó 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. DOI of original article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2015.08.002 ⇑ Corresponding author. E-mail address: purba-jh@batan.go.id (J.H. Purba). Table 7 The top 24 minimal cut sets of the CERPS Group 1 fault tree. Id. Minimal cut sets mcs 1 CE1-RYT-CF-TR2OF4 mcs 2 CE1-ROD-CF-RODS mcs 3 CE1-CBI-CF-6OF8 * /CE1-RPS-TM-CHA mcs 4 /CE1-RPS-TM-CHA * CE1-RYL-CF-LM12OF24 mcs 5 CE1-CBI-CF-4OF6TM * CE1-RPS-TM-CHA mcs 6 CE1-RYT-FF-ICM1 * CE1-RYT-FF-ICM2 mcs 7 CE1-RYT-FF-ICM3 * CE1-RYT-FF-ICM4 mcs 8 CE1-RPS-TM-CHA * CE1-RYL-CF-LM6OF12TM mcs 9 CE1-CBI-CF-P3OF4 * CE1-CPA-CF-T3OF4 * /CE1-RPS-TM-CHA mcs 10 CE1-CPA-CF-T3OF4 * CE1-CPR-CF-P3OF4 * /CE1-RPS-TM-CHA mcs 11 CE1-CBI-CF-P3OF4 * CE1-CTP-CF-CT3OF4 * /CE1-RPS-TM-CHA mcs 12 CE1-CBI-CF-P3OF4 * CE1-CTP-CF-HT3OF4 * /CE1-RPS-TM-CHA mcs 13 CE1-CBI-CF-P3OF4 * CE1-CBI-CF-T3OF4 * /CE1-RPS-TM-CHA mcs 14 CE1-CPA-CF-T2OF3TM * CE1-CPR-CF-P2OF3TM * CE1-RPS-TM-CHA mcs 15 /CE1-RPS-TM-CHA * CE1-RYL-CF-1LM6OF6 * CE1-RYT-FF-ICM2 mcs 16 /CE1-RPS-TM-CHA * CE1-RYL-CF-2LM6OF6 * CE1-RYT-FF-ICM1 mcs 17 /CE1-RPS-TM-CHA * CE1-RYL-CF-3LM6OF6 * CE1-RYT-FF-ICM4 mcs 18 /CE1-RPS-TM-CHA * CE1-RYL-CF-4LM6OF6 * CE1-RYT-FF-ICM3 mcs 19 CE1-CPR-CF-P3OF4 * CE1-CTP-CF-CT3OF4 * /CE1-RPS-TM-CHA mcs 20 CE1-CPR-CF-P3OF4 * CE1-CTP-CF-HT3OF4 * /CE1-RPS-TM-CHA mcs 21 CE1-CBI-CF-T3OF4 * CE1-CPR-CF-P3OF4 * /CE1-RPS-TM-CHA mcs 22 CE1-CPA-FF-TB * CE1-CPA-FF-TC * CE1-CPR-CF-P2OF3TM * CE1-RPS- TM-CHA mcs 23 CE1-CPA-FF-TB * CE1-CPA-FF-TD * CE1-CPR-CF-P2OF3TM * CE1-RPS- TM-CHA mcs 24 CE1-CPA-FF-TC * CE1-CPA-FF-TD * CE1-CPR-CF-P2OF3TM * CE1-RPS- TM-CHA Annals of Nuclear Energy xxx (2017) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Annals of Nuclear Energy journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/anucene Please cite this article in press as: Purba, J.H., et al. Corrigendum to ‘‘Fuzzy probability based fault tree analysis to propagate and quantify epistemic uncer- tainty” [Ann. Nucl. Energy 85 (2015) 1189–1199]. Ann. Nucl. Energy (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2017.05.043