21 8 SPECIAL SECTION 1998. Research under dictatorship: the German Archacu- logical Inslitute 1929-1845, Antiquity 72: 282-92. KATEK. M.H. 1974. Das '7ilinenerbe.der SS 1Y35-1946. Ein Beitrag zur Kulturpulitik des Dritteri Reiches. Stuttgart: Deutsche \lerlagsanstalt. 2nd cdition 1987: Munich: Oldenbourg. KRAMER, W. 1964. Gerhard Berm zum Gcdiiichtnis, Rriicht der RGK45: 1-111 In press. Cerharrl Rersu, ein deutscher Prahistoriker, Bericht der I{GK 82. KUNZE, E. 1982. Naclruf HIIIS Miihius. Jnhrhuch derBayerischen Akodernie der lh'issenscliuftrii 1982: 1 96-2flO. LOSGMANN, V. 1977. Nu~ionulsoziulisrn~~s rind Antike. Sfudien ZLU Entwicklnng des E'uches Alle Grschirhle 1W3-1.945. Hamburg: Hoffmann und Camp. LIII.I.IEX, R. W. SCHIERINC (ed.). 1988. ArrhAologrnbiidnisse. Portriits und Kurzbiograpliieii von Klassischen ArchBologen deutscher Sprache. MainL: Phi lipp von Zabcrn. MARCHAND, S. 1996. LJow~i from Olympus: Archaeology and Philhellenism in Ccrmony, 1750-1 970. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press. I~ZLEGH RAIIFOKD. C.A. 1965. Obituary Gerhard Rersti, The Anficjiinries Journal 45: 323-4. UNVERZAGT, M. 1985. Wilhelm 1Jnverzagt und die f'1aliinc ZIII' Griindung eiries lristilrils fcr die Vorgeschichte Ostdentschlunds. Mainz: Philipp von Zabern. Das Deutsche Archaologischc Institiit, Geschichte und Dokumente 8. Past records, new views: Carnac 1830-2000 CORINNE ROUGHLEY, ANDREW SHERRATT & COLIN SHELL * Ke-v-words: megaliths, Carnac, 19th century, surveys and plans. John Bathurst Deane, Sir Henry Dryden, W.C. Lukis. aerial photography, geographical information system, history of archaeology The megalithic monuments of Carnac, Brittany, in the DBpartement of the Morbihan, are amongst the most farnous in France. indeed in the world. This region has not only the densest conccn- tration of such sites in Europe but also retained its importance as a centre of monument-build- ing from the late 5th to the :jrd millennium FK:, giving it a unique significance in the study of Neolithic landscapes (Sherratt 1990; 1998). Its menhirs, stone alignments, and megalithic tombs have attracted the attention of scholars since the 18th century, and there is thus an unusu- ally full record, both written and pictorial, of the nature of these monuments as they were perceived over 300 years. This documentation is of interest not only for the history of archae- ology, but also because it contains information about these sites which cannot be otherwise ascertained. Such early records have two ad- vantages: first, they show the sites before changes which resulted from the accelerated pace of destruction (and reconstruction) in more recent times, and secondly they were made at a time when the landscape was more open than it is today, so that it was easier to see the larger re- lationships between groups of stones. Their disadvantage is of course that standards of ac- curacy in recording have improved more or less continuously over this time, so that the most accurate records apply to the most altered states of the sites, and only relatively simplc records were taken when the monuments were at their most complete. The following discussion illus- trates how these two advantages of complete- ness and accuracy can be combined, so that an optimal record of these world-famous monu- ments may be obtained. The historical record The work prcsented here is a small sample of a current project1 under the auspices of the AREA network, concerned with early records of the megalithic monuments of the Morbihan. 1 This project The Neolithic Londscope of the Carnnc Region under the direction of Andrew Sherratt, is based in the Ashmolean Museum, Oxford, and uses the catalogue of megalithic sites in the Morbihan and their archaeologi- cal documentation prepared bctween 1986 arid 1890 with the assistance of Sue Kobinson and Shirley Collier, which incorporatcs all archival docurricntation in British collcc- tions, together with puhlished French sources. Corinne Roughley, who is now a member of the project. has recently completed her doctoral thesis at the Department of Archae- ology. University of Cambridge on the use of GIS and Visu- alisation in investigating the Neolithic landscapes of the Morbihari [furidcd by Ilic NERC); Colin Shell supervised tho technical aspects of this work and was instrumental not only in obtaining the NERC aerial photographs used in this article but iri helping to georefererice them by GPS lor orthorectification and mosaicking. * Koughley & Sherratt, Ashmolean Museum, llniversity of Oxford, Oxford 0x1 2~11, England. Shell, Department of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, Docvnirig Street, Cambridge (:HZ ~DL, England. ANTIQUlTY 76 (2002): 218-23