Scientia Horticulturae 184 (2015) 171–178
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Scientia Horticulturae
journal h om epage: www.elsevier.com/locate/scihorti
Red and blue light effects on morphology and flowering of
Petunia × hybrida
Pramod Gautam, Meseret Tesema Terfa, Jorunn Elisabeth Olsen, Sissel Torre
∗
Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Department of Plant Sciences, P.O. Box 5003, 1432 Ås, Norway
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:
Received 29 June 2014
Received in revised form
30 December 2014
Accepted 7 January 2015
Available online 5 February 2015
Keywords:
Flowering
FR-deficient film
Light-emitting diodes
Plant morphology
Petunia
a b s t r a c t
To investigate the effects of R and B in environments with different FR levels, Petunia × hybrida ‘Tidal
wave’ were grown in a greenhouse during early spring (March) and late spring (May) under plastic film
transmitting (+FR) and not transmitting far-red light (-FR) in combination with R and B light emitting
diodes (LED) as supplementary light placed underneath the films. The main objective of the study was
to test the effect of R (600–700 nm, peak 660) and B light (400–500 nm, peak 450) on morphology and
flowering in a FR-deficient greenhouse environment compared with an environment with FR light in
different seasons. R light reduced shoot elongation and resulted in more compact plants in both seasons
and the combination of –FR and R light resulted in the most compact plants without much delay in
flowering. By contrast, the effect of B light was dependent on the natural background light level and
the presence of FR light. In early spring when the natural irradiance was low (1.35 mol m
-2
h
-1
), B light
promoted stem elongation, caused a more upright shoot orientation, increased plant height and promoted
flowering compared to control and R light, whereas in late spring, when the natural irradiance was higher
(2.33 mol m
-2
h
-1
), the effect of B light in a FR-deficient environment was not significantly different from
R light in the response to stem elongation and flowering.
© 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Control of morphology and flowering are important in the pro-
duction of high-quality bedding plants. Plant growth regulators
(PGRs) are commonly used by growers to grow compact plants
(Rademacher, 2000). Due to negative impacts on the environment
and expected future restrictions on the use of PGRs, there is a strong
need for alternative strategies and other tools to control plant shape
(Sørensen and Danielsen, 2006). Environmental factors such as
temperature, light, watering, mechanical stress and fertilization are
well known to modify plant morphology. However, manipulation
of some of these factors may be difficult to implement during plant
production and some factors may delay or inhibit flowering like
temperature manipulations (Langton and Horridge, 2006; Myster
and Moe, 1995).
Flowering of Petunia × hybrida is accelerated under photo-
periods longer than 12 h but is also sensitive to irradiance and
light quality (Adams et al., 1999). High irradiance as well as far-red
(FR) light promote flowering but induce unwanted stem elonga-
tion growth (Adams et al., 1999; Kubota et al., 2000; Patil et al.,
∗
Corresponding author. Tel.: +47 64965628.
E-mail address: sissel.torre@nmbu.no (S. Torre).
2001). Manipulation of light is a central topic in greenhouse pro-
duction and important in optimization of photosynthesis and as a
signal in photoperiodic and photomorphogenic responses of plants.
The ability of plants to sense and respond to light depends on their
photosynthetic pigments and photoreceptors that absorbs differ-
ent wavelengths of the light. Responses to light quality like FR
(700–800 nm) and red (R) light (600–700 nm) are acting via the
light-absorbing pigment phytochrome, which is sensing the rela-
tive amount of R and FR light in the environment (Smith, 2000). Blue
(B) light (400–500 nm) is also absorbed by phytochrome but also
via the B/UV-A absorbing pigment cryptochrome and phototropin
(Lin, 2000).
In petunia, R light has been found to suppress plant height and
flowering but stimulates lateral shoot elongation. In contrast, B
light increased shoot elongation and promoted flowering of petu-
nia (Fukuda et al., 2011). However, the experiment of Fukuda et al.
(2011) was carried out in closed growth chambers at rather low
irradiance (100 mol m
-2
s
-1
) without natural light. In other stud-
ies performed in greenhouses, B light was found to suppress stem
elongation growth of roses and poinsettia (Islam et al., 2012; Terfa
et al., 2013). In addition, a B light-deficient environment has been
found to promote stem elongation in many long-day plants (LDP)
(Runkle and Heins, 2001). However, in chrysanthemum, the effect
of B light on plant height was found to be dependent on the
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.01.004
0304-4238/© 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.