Short communication Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 2018 doi: 10.15761/CMID.1000140 ISSN: 2398-8096 Volume 3(2): 1-2 Human pathogens and vaccine development: New perspective Pooja Sanduja 1 , Abhinay Sharma 1 , Meenakshi Dua 2 and Atul K Johri 1 * 1 School of Life Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, India 2 School of Environmental Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, India *Correspondence to: Atul K Johri School of Life Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India, E-mail: akjohri14@yahoo.com Received: June 27, 2018; Accepted: August 10, 2018; Published: August 14, 2018 Introduction Infectious diseases remain one of the most important causes of death and disabilities in the world. Lack of efective treatment against infectious diseases and development of the resistance in pathogens forced the researchers to develop new vaccines or to signifcantly improve the efectiveness of currently available vaccines. In the past, conventional approaches have been followed for vaccine development. For example, the “frst generation” vaccines were developed based on the use of inactivated or live attenuated pathogens. Te “second generation” vaccines are purifed microbial cell components and referred to as subunit vaccines. Te “third generation” of vaccines is currently under development with the use of bioinformatics, genomics, proteomics and associated techniques. Conventional approaches take 5-15 years in order to develop vaccines [1,2]. With the advent of the genome sequences, a more detailed understanding of microbial infection may be achieved at the molecular level. It is now possible to generate the genome sequence information of a human pathogen in 1-2 years at low cost [2]. Te generated genomic information can be used to screen the inclusive set of potential proteins/genes encoded by pathogens in the search of vaccine candidates. Furthermore, available multi-genome sequences of same species can be used to identify a core set of genes as well as a variable set of genes diferentially expressed in pathogenic strains in comparison to non-pathogenic strains. AIDS, malaria, tuberculosis, typhoid, meningitis, dengue, and diseases caused by HIV, Plasmodium, Mycobacterium, Streptococcus, Salmonella, Infuenza and other pathogens are the major concerns for vaccine research. Te biggest challenge for vaccine development is against highly variable and fastly evolving human pathogen [3]. In order to identify vaccine candidates, ‘reverse vaccinology’ approach would be of high signifcance as it is less time consuming, not expensive, and also provide crucial information for many infectious diseases for which conventional approaches are not useful or are failed. Te successful use of multigenome analysis, screening, and use of proteomics approach to develop a universal vaccine against highly variable pathogen may open new avenues for the successful development of universal protein-based vaccines for other infectious organisms for which suitable vaccines are either not available or need improvement [4,5]. It is also a known fact that, despite the availability of the genome information for faster target identifcation, we are still involved with the time-consuming validation steps that are performed using conventional approaches. An additional application of protein microarray and nanoproteomics will revolutionize the vaccine research in which identifcation of potential vaccine candidates would become faster and more authentic [2,6]. Furthermore, it will reduce the antigen validation burden and increase the success rate of vaccine development by selecting the most relevant vaccine candidates using genome-based technologies. In addition, AFM is a powerful technique which would be very handy to identify proteins of surface origin and to measure their binding capacity and hydrophobic nature. Protein microarray and AFM complement classical proteomic and molecular biology approaches for the functional validation of surface proteins, which may help in the identifcation of novel antimicrobial drugs and vaccine [6-8]. Serotype diversity of infectious organisms is a global problem; therefore a vaccine developed for the prevalent serotypes of developed countries may or may not work in case of developing countries. Terefore, for an efective vaccine development, we need to have accurate epidemiological data of infectious organisms. However, there is a huge shortage in epidemiological data from Africa, Sub-Saharan Africa, Asia, Pacifc countries and South America. As economically low and middle-income countries are adversely afected by serious and deadly diseases because of poor hygiene and lack of awareness. Terefore, there is a need to develop collaboration with high- income countries/technologically advanced countries to develop epidemiological centers to fll the gap [9,10]. WHO reports that developing countries are severely afected by most infectious organisms as compared to developed countries [11]. Most of the time, cause of infection remains even unidentifed in developing countries due to lack of facilities. Terefore, we also need to develop low-priced and efective diagnostic kit for each of diseases caused by above harmful human pathogens. In order to achieve it, (1) we can have a consortium with pharmaceutical companies and other research groups (2) we need to fll the gap in pathophysiology of each diseases and identify marker corresponding to the disease (3) Markers identifed for each disease can be exploited to make a universally applicable diagnostic kit (4) Development of a vaccine preparation which should have coverage all over the world. References 1. Rappuoli R (2004) From Pasteur to genomics: progress and challenges in infectious diseases. Nat Med 10: 1177-1185. [Crossref] 2. Bagnoli F1, Baudner B, Mishra RP, Bartolini E, Fiaschi L, et al. (2011) Designing the next generation of vaccines for global public health. OMICS 15: 545-566. [Crossref] 3. Delany I, Rappuoli R, De Gregorio E (2014) Vaccines for the 21st century. EMBO Mol Med 6: 708-720. [Crossref]