Archives of Pychiatry and Behavioral Sciences V2 . I2 . 2019 33 Introduction The Structured Inventory of Malingered Sympto- matology (SIMS) [1] was written by Glenn Smith while he was a psychology student and was first published in 1997 [2]. The SIMS has not been adequately constructed and validated for clinical or legal use in accordance with the standards specified by the American Psychological Association [3]. A recent study by a Canadian team [4] showed that none of the items Archives of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences ISSN: 2638-5201 Volume 2, Issue 2, 2019, PP: 33-39 Content Validity of the Affective Disorder Subscale of the SIMS Zack Zdenek Cernovsky 1 *, James Dominic Mendonça 1 , Jack Remo Ferrari 2 , Gurpreet Sidhu 3 , Varadaraj Velamoor 4 , Stephan C. Mann 5 , Lamidi Kola Oyewumi 6 , Emmanuel Persad 7 , Robbie Campbell 1 , Michel A Woodbury-Fariña 8 1 Department of Psychiatry, University of Western Ontario (Western University), London, Canada. 2 Psychological Clinic, London, Canada. 3 Methadone Clinic, London, Canada. 4 Professor of Psychiatry, Laurentian and Lakehead Universities, and Professor Emeritus of Psychiatry, Western University, Canada. 5 Central Montgomery Behavioral Health, Norristown, PA, USA. 6 Department of Psychiatry, Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, and Department of Psychology, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada. 7 Professor Emeritus of Psychiatry, Western University, and Adjunct Professor, Queen’s University, Canada 8 Department of Psychiatry, University of Puerto Rico, USA *Corresponding Author: Zack Cernovsky, Dept. of Psychiatry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada. zcernovs@uwo.ca Abstract Background and Objective: The Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS) is used widely to “detect malingering” of medical symptoms, even though there is no convincing evidence that it does differentiate malingerers from patients with legitimate symptoms. This study focuses on the Affective Disorder (AF) subscale of the SIMS. Method: In Study 1, ten raters (3 psychologists and 7 psychiatrists), each with more than 35 years of clinical experience, evaluated whether the AF items have any capacity to differentiate malingerers from legitimate patients. Study 2 evaluated responses to AF items by 16 survivors of high impact car accidents (6 men and 10 women; mean age 36.6 years, SD=12.3). Study 3 compared responses of these 16 patients to SIMS responses of 30 instructed malingerers and also to 47 medical patients who sustained only relatively minor injuries in car accidents (data from a 2014 study led by Capilla Ramírez with González Ordi). Results: All ten raters agreed that none of the AF items would be endorsed only by malingerers: on the contrary, all AF items list only legitimate symptoms of depression. The most frequently endorsed items by our 16 post- accident patients were those dealing with lack of energy (100% of the patients) and sleep problems (93.8%). 87.5% of these 16 patients who survived high impact car collisions would be falsely classified by the AF as “malingering an affective disorder.” These 16 patients obtained significantly higher AF scores and higher total SIMS score than the 47 Spanish patients who sustained only relatively minor injuries in their car accidents (t-tests, p<.001). The 16 patients did not differ significantly in their AF and total SIMS scores from the instructed malingerers recruited in the Spanish study (p>.05). Discussion and Conclusions: The AF subscale of the SIMS contains no items with reasonable capacity to differentiate malingerers from legitimate patients. The SIMS is a fallacious test: its use on real patients is iatrogenic. Keywords: malingering, depression, post-concussion syndrome, whiplash, SIMS.