ORIGINAL ARTICLE Histology with immunohistochemistry of the stula region in female anorectal malformation: Can it be used for neo-anus reconstruction? Anand Pandey , 1 Pinky Pandey, 2 Shailendra P Singh, 1 Savita Agarwal, 2 Vipin Gupta 1 and Rajesh Verma 1 Departments of 1 Surgery, and 2 Pathology, Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences, Saifai, Uttar Pradesh, India Aim: Female anorectal malformation is characterised by communication to the exterior by a stula. There are conicting reports of the presence of normal anus in the stula region. This study was undertaken to assess the histopathology and immunohistochemical correlation of the termi- nal portion of the stula in female patients and suitability of stula incorporation in the reconstruction of the neo-anus. Methods: This prospective study included 13 patients of female anorectal malformation. Of these, seven had a vestibular stula (VF), and the rest had an anterior ectopic anus (AEA). Histopathology of the stula region was undertaken, along with immunohistochemistry. Various ndings were evaluated. Results: Of seven VF patients, four showed atrophic or disrupted internal sphincter smooth muscle, whereas the remaining three showed hyper- tropic internal sphincteric smooth muscle. Six patients showed hypertrophic nerve bundle. Five VF patients showed subepithelial brosis, and none of them showed ganglion cells. Of six patients of AEA, internal sphincteric smooth muscle was normal in ve. It was hypertrophic in one patient. Transitional epithelium was present in four patients. All patients showed hypertrophic nerve bundle and aganglionosis. Subepithelial bro- sis was observed in six patients. Conclusion: The stula region in VF and AEA patients appears to be an abnormal structure. Rather than preservation of the terminal stulous region, resection followed by anoplasty may be a viable option. Key words: anterior ectopic anus; female anorectal malformation; histology of vestibular stula; vestibular stula. What is already known on this topic 1 Anorectal malformation is a common congenital malformation. 2 There is a difference of opinion on the use of the stula region for neo-anus reconstruction. What this paper adds 1 Histology of the stula region does not show it to be a nor- mal part. 2 Immunohistochemistry further provides evidence that the stula region is devoid of the ganglion cells; it had hypertrophic nerve bundles, and there is presence of subepithelial brosis. Anorectal malformation (ARM) is an important congenital defect. It presents with a wide spectrum of defects, ranging from rela- tively low malformations to very complex cloacal anomalies. 1 Female ARM is characterised by absent anal opening, and the bowel may be communicating to the exterior by a stula 2 ; how- ever, other presentations of female ARM do exist. Some investigators have suggested the abnormality of the innervation of this stula region. 3 Contrary to this, some researchers have found manometric and histological evidence of features of a normal anus in this region, such as the presence of an internal sphincter, transitional epithelium and anal glands and crypts. 4,5 One recent study has refuted this claim. 6 Hence, the use of stulas for the creation of neo-anus is controversial. This study was undertaken to assess the histopathology and immunohistochemical evaluation of the terminal portion of the stula in female patients and the suitability of stula incorpora- tion in the construction of neo-anus in the patients. Methods This study was conducted in the Institutes hospital from February 2013 to February 2015. It was approved by the hospital research and ethical committee (no. 7914/RIMS&R/Estt-F/2013- 14). All female ARM patients with either vestibular stula (VF) or anterior ectopic anus (AEA) were included in the study. As per the recent Krickenbeck classication for ARM, 7 VF com- prises either an anus or rectum opening into the vestibule, and the normal anal opening is absent. Thus, the vestibule has three opening urethra, vagina and stula. AEA is a regional variant Correspondence: Dr Anand Pandey, Department of Pediatric Surgery, King Georges Medical University, Chowk, Lucknow 226003, India; email: anandpandey@kgmcindia.edu Conict of interest: None declared. Accepted for publication 21 July 2017. doi:10.1111/jpc.13691 Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health (2017) © 2017 Paediatrics and Child Health Division (The Royal Australasian College of Physicians) 1