Journal of Chromatography A, 1216 (2009) 5242–5248
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Journal of Chromatography A
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/chroma
Determining the stoichiometry and binding constants of inclusion complexes
formed between aromatic compounds and -cyclodextrin by solid-phase
microextraction coupled to high-performance liquid chromatography
Guillaume Chalumot, Cong Yao, Verónica Pino
∗
, Jared L. Anderson
∗∗
Department of Chemistry, The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43606, USA
article info
Article history:
Received 23 March 2009
Received in revised form 28 April 2009
Accepted 8 May 2009
Available online 15 May 2009
Keywords:
Cyclodextrins
Stoichiometry
Binding constants
Solid-phase microextraction
abstract
The complexation of native -cyclodextrin (CD) and seven aromatic compounds, namely, phenetole,
toluene, m-xylene, naphthalene, biphenyl, fluorene and phenanthrene, has been studied for first time uti-
lizing a solid-phase microextraction (SPME)–high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method.
The stoichiometries of the analyte:-CD complexes were found to be either 1:1 or 1:2. The formation
of 1:2 complexes was confirmed for naphthalene, biphenyl, fluorene, and phenanthrene only when uti-
lizing relatively high concentrations of -CD (up to 6.6 mM). The 1:2 stoichiometries were confirmed
using the classical modified Benesi–Hildebrand (BH) method. The calculated binding constants for 1:1
stoichiometries (K
1
) using the SPME method varied from 115.3M
-1
for toluene to 3510M
-1
for phenan-
threne, whereas the corresponding values to the 1:2 stoichiometries (K
3
) varied from 7.30 × 10
5
M
-2
for
biphenyl to 9.03 × 10
6
M
-2
for naphthalene.
© 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Native cyclodextrins (-, -, or -CDs) are cyclic oligosaccha-
rides known to form inclusion complexes in aqueous solutions with
a variety of polar and non-polar compounds including monoaro-
matic and polyaromatic hydrocarbons via 1:1, 1:2 or even 2:2
stoichiometries [1,2]. The exact nature of the driving force of com-
plexation of cyclodextrins with guest molecules is not known. It
is a combination of CD-ring strain release upon complexation,
geometrical compatibility, van der Waals forces, electrostatic, and
hydrophobic interactions and, in some cases, hydrogen bonding
between the cyclodextrin and the guest molecule [3]. The formation
of these complexes can lead to an increase in the solubility of the
solutes in the aqueous phase [4], as well as improved chemical and
physical stability [5]. CDs have been widely applied in many areas
such as food research [6], environment protection [1,7], and espe-
cially pharmacology [8,9]. Due to their usefulness and applications,
different studies have been performed to evaluate the stability
binding constants and the stoichiometries of the complexes formed
by CDs.
∗
Corresponding author. On leave from Department of Analytical Chemistry, Uni-
versidad de La Laguna, Spain. Tel.: +34 922318012; fax: +34 922318090.
∗∗
Co-corresponding author. Tel.: +1 4195301508; fax: +1 4195304033.
E-mail addresses: veropino@ull.es (V. Pino),
Jared.Anderson@UToledo.edu (J.L. Anderson).
Many separation-based and non-separation-based methods
have been developed to determine binding constants [10], with
some of them being recently reviewed [11]. High-performance
liquid chromatography [12,13], affinity capillary electrophoresis
[8,14,15], and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry [16,17],
among others, have been applied to the determination of bind-
ing to cyclodextrins, each of which possesses various advantages
and shortcomings [11]. In addition to these methods, the modi-
fied Benesi–Hildebrand (BH) method is a widely used approach for
determining the stoichiometry and equilibrium constants of non-
bonded interactions, particularly 1:1 and 1:2 interactions, with CD
complexes [18]. Its wide applicability is justified by its facile com-
bination with different techniques (UV–vis, fluorescence, infrared,
NMR, etc.) [19,20].
Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) is a successful solvent-free
extraction technique often used for the determination of a high
number of volatile and semivolatile compounds [21–23]. It is a very
convenient technique for studying chemical equilibria within a liq-
uid matrix due to the small amount of analytes extracted by the
SPME coating, which leaves the equilibrium virtually undisturbed
[24,25]. In fact, SPME has been applied to the determination of the
freely available concentration of different analytes in the presence
of complex matrixes [26–29]. SPME combined with GC [30–32] and
more recently with HPLC [33] has also been described as a simple
and viable method to study the partitioning behavior of different
analytes to micelles formed by traditional surfactants or by several
ionic liquids.
0021-9673/$ – see front matter © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2009.05.017