Strategic Planning for Building Research—A Process
Oriented Methodology
A. Warszawski, F.ASCE
1
; R. Becker
2
; and R. Navon, M.ASCE
3
Abstract: This paper explains and discusses the development of a strategic plan for the management of research in building in a planning
horizon of 8–10 years. The plan has three major elements: 1 a knowledge base with ranked long range research needs in each discipline;
2 a second base which defines the main objectives of the building sector and the major interdisciplinary problems that must be solved
in order to attain them; and 3 the procedures to be followed in order to initiate and carry out an annual research program in view of the
strategic plan and the current information maintained in the two bases. This paper dwells first on the special features of research as a
knowledge building and problem solving tool, and then describes the process of the actual development of the strategic plan for building
research in Israel, including the construction of the knowledge bases and the generation of the annual research programs. Special attention
is given to the objectivity and accountability of the process.
DOI: 10.1061/ASCE0733-93642007133:9710
CE Database subject headings: Research; Construction management; Methodology.
Preface
Research and development is the main driving force toward the
technology advancement of modern industry. In most industries,
it is typically carried out inhouse, usually in large companies. Its
expenses are considered as an investment in capital assets to be
used for the enhancement of the company’s production capacity.
The situation is different in the building sector. The fragmentation
of construction resources, the diversity of projects, and the long
fruition period of any technological development result in re-
search being more expensive and less beneficial for a building
company than in other industries. Therefore, very seldom is build-
ing research carried out in private companies. It is usually spon-
sored and financed by public authorities, and carried out mostly in
universities and public research institutes, while the majority of
its end users are the private sector practitioners.
Because of the institutional separation of the research work
from practice, there is often a considerable difference between the
expectations of the sponsor, the end users, and those of the re-
searchers. The end user, and in most cases the sponsor as well, is
looking for the bottom line which will present him with a practi-
cal solution to his current problem, while the researcher is inter-
ested in a wider perspective and an understanding of the basic
problem. The public sponsor also recognizes, to some extent, the
significance of creating knowledge that may be beneficial in solv-
ing foreseeable future problems and not only those which exist at
the present. Very often a single research study is only one stone in
a wider mosaic, which elucidates the knowledge of a certain area,
and it does not offer, of course, a solution to all the problems in
that area, despite the fact that the end user or sponsor may expect
it. As a result, a large number of research reports—even those
which have been considered as a breakthrough in international
professional literature—find their way to remote shelves and
gradually “gather dust.” Consequently, it has been recognized by
all interested parties that there is a need to reduce, as much as
possible, the gaps in understanding the nature of research and its
benefits on the one hand, and its limitations on the other. An
effective way to achieve it is by means of a strategic research plan
that identifies the research subjects, which can either contribute
directly to the immediate practice needs or to the basic knowledge
to be used in the future.
In this paper, we review the process of preparing a strategic
research plan for the Israeli Ministry of Construction and Housing
carried out at the National Building Research Institute NBRI.
The plan was intended to fulfill the research needs of the building
sector and create a framework for annual funding allocations for
research proposals submitted to the Ministry. The study consisted
of two parts, the first, which was of general nature, dealt with the
methodology that then guided the whole plan preparation, and the
second dealt with each professional discipline separately. The
plan was prepared by a team of senior researchers; Professor
Abraham Warszawski, as the team leader, and Professor Rachel
Becker, Professor Sam Frydman, Professor Joshua Frostig, Pro-
fessor Amnon Katz, and Professor Ronie Navon, as the experts in
the areas of buildings performance, geotechnology, structural en-
gineering, building materials and technology, and construction
management, respectively Warszawski et al. 2005. The study is
reviewed in the following order: First, the concept of research and
its main characteristics is explained, and its application to the area
of buildings is reviewed. Next, the process of identifying the re-
search needs and their preferences is examined in its strategic
context by means of the systems approach. Finally, the procedures
1
Professor, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Technion
City, 32000 Haifa, Israel. E-mail: cvrabwa@tx.technion.ac.il
2
Associate Professor, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineer-
ing, Technion City, 32000 Haifa, Israel. E-mail: becker@tx.technion.ac.il
3
Associate Professor, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineer-
ing, Technion City, 32000 Haifa, Israel. E-mail: ronie@technion.ac.il
Note. Discussion open until February 1, 2008. Separate discussions
must be submitted for individual papers. To extend the closing date by
one month, a written request must be filed with the ASCE Managing
Editor. The manuscript for this paper was submitted for review and pos-
sible publication on April 4, 2007; approved on May 2, 2007. This paper
is part of the Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,
Vol. 133, No. 9, September 1, 2007. ©ASCE, ISSN 0733-9364/2007/9-
710–722/$25.00.
710 / JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT © ASCE / SEPTEMBER 2007