_____________________________________________________________________________________________________ *Corresponding author: E-mail: tinbio05@yahoo.com; Asian J. Res. Crop Sci., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 11-16, 2023 Asian Journal of Research in Crop Science Volume 8, Issue 2, Page 11-16, 2023; Article no.AJRCS.96405 ISSN: 2581-7167 Integration of Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) as Cash Crop on Shaded Land Areas at Café Project in Conner, Apayao Agustina G. Pattung a* , Nathaniel Llamelo a , Satur Bangyad a , Ramon Dorado a , Lea Balingit a , Oliver Situt a and Adjustor Batara a a Apayao State College, Malama, Conner, Apayao, Philippines. Authors’ contributions This work was carried out in collaboration among all authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Article Information DOI: 10.9734/AJRCS/2023/v8i2160 Open Peer Review History: This journal follows the Advanced Open Peer Review policy. Identity of the Reviewers, Editor(s) and additional Reviewers, peer review comments, different versions of the manuscript, comments of the editors, etc are available here: https://www.sdiarticle5.com/review-history/96405 Received: 04/12/2022 Accepted: 15/02/2023 Published: 18/02/2023 ABSTRACT The study was conducted to determine the growth and yield of mungbean integrated as a cash crop in the Conservation Agriculture in Forest Ecosystem (CAFÉ) Project sites at Barangay Guina-ang, Conner, Apayao. The CAFÉ Project was launched with the intention of promoting environmentally sound farming practices in the uplands of Apayao. The four mungbean varieties: NSIC Mg 05 – Pag-asa 11, NSIC Mg 12 – Pag-asa 19, NSIC Mg 09 – Pag-asa 15, and NSIC Mg 17 – Pag-asa 17 were planted around 2 meters away from the nearest trees in partially-shaded areas with slopes not exceeding 50 degrees. It was laid out in 5 m x 10 m quadrants arranged in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications. Results of the study revealed that V 1 and V 2 were late maturing (86.50; 87.16 DAT), taller (65.25; 68.85 cm), had more pods per plant (16.72; 15.92), longer pod length (9.42; 9.36cm) more seeds per pod (12.42; 10.88), heavier seed weight (33.46; Original Research Article