May 2002: (II)S26 –S34
Maternal Nutrition—Effect on Fetal Growth
and Outcome of Pregnancy
Prema Ramachandran, M.D.
During the rst half of the 20th century, chronic
energy undernutrition due to low dietary intake,
repeated infections, and rapid succession of
pregnancy were the factors most responsible for
maternal undernutrition and consequent adverse
outcomes of pregnancy. Efforts to improve di-
etary intake, treatment of infections, and provi-
sion of contraceptive care were the major fo-
cuses of intervention from 1950 to 1990. These
interventions resulted in reduction in severe
grades of undernutrition. However, there was no
reduction in mild and moderate degrees of un-
dernutrition and anemia during pregnancy and
there was no signicant improvement in the
course and outcome of pregnancy, or in birth
weight. During the 1990s, among the middle- and
upper-income groups, there has been a progres-
sive rise in obesity and consequent adverse ef-
fects. The advent of HIV infection in India in the
1980s will inevitably lead to increases in severe
undernutrition associated with HIV infection in
pregnancy and an adverse impact of maternal
HIV infection on the fetus. Practicing physicians
and nutritionists in the new millennium will there-
fore have to assess each person individually and
provide appropriate advice regarding diet, exer-
cise, fertility, and infection prevention and control
in order to achieve optimum health and nutrition
status during pregnancy and to prevent adverse
pregnancy outcomes.
© 2002 International Life Sciences Institute
Introduction
It has long been recognized that pregnant and lactating
women form one of the most vulnerable segments of the
population from a nutrition point of view. The ill effects
of maternal undernutrition affect not only the mother but
also her offspring. During the second half of the twen-
tieth century, studies were undertaken to dene the
nutrition requirements during pregnancy, the adverse
consequences of undernutrition on the mother-child dyad
and the intervention strategies for minimizing, if not
eliminating, these adverse consequences. Adverse nutri-
tion and health consequences of “too early, too close, too
many, and too late” pregnancies on the mother-child
dyad were recognized early in India and contraceptive
care was identied as an effective indirect intervention to
improve maternal and child nutrition. While undernutri-
tion continues to be a major problem as in the earlier
decades, the 1980s have witnessed the progressive rise in
obesity and lifestyle-related chronic noncommunicable
diseases in the middle- and upper-income groups. Thus
India today has to combat the double burden of under-
nutrition and obesity.
Research studies during the 1960s and 1970s docu-
mented the magnitude of adverse effects associated with
iron, folate, iodine, and vitamin A deciency during
pregnancy and lactation. National programs to combat
these micronutrient deciencies were drawn up and are
being implemented. In recent years, there have been
reports of the reemergence of problems such as vitamin
D deciency in pregnancy in the middle- and upper-
income groups in some parts of the country.
Yet another important indirect cause of undernutri-
tion continues to be infections. Obstetricians and pedia-
tricians continue to tackle the increased morbidity in
anemic women and children. Associations between uri-
nary tract infection, chlamydial infection, and low birth
weight have been reported in some studies. With the
advent of HIV epidemic in India in the 1980s, it is
inevitable that over the next decade there will be an
increase in the severe undernutrition associated with HIV
in pregnancy and adverse impact of maternal HIV infec-
tion on the fetus. Screening for these infections and their
management will have to become a part of antenatal care.
Thus practicing physicians and nutritionists will
have to assess each person carefully and provide appro-
priate advice regarding diet, exercise, fertility, and infec-
tion prevention and control to improve health and nutri-
tion status.
Dr. Ramachandran is Adviser, (Health, Nutrition &
Family Welfare) Planning Commission, Yojana Bha-
van, Sansad Marg New Delhi-110001, India. Views
expressed in the paper are views of the author and not
of Planning Commission, Government of India.
S26 Nutrition Reviews , Vol. 60, No. 5
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/nutritionreviews/article/60/suppl_7/S26/1884486 by guest on 17 December 2021