Technical contribution
Length–weight and length–length relationships for cavedano chub Squalius squalus
(Bonaparte, 1837) in Italy
By D. Giannetto
1
, A. Carosi
1
, L. Ghetti
2
, G. Maio
3
, E. Pizzul
4
, L. Pompei
1
, P. Turin
5
and M. Lorenzoni
1
1
Dipartimento di Biologia Cellulare e Ambientale, Universit a di Perugia, Perugia, Italy;
2
Regione dell’Umbria, Servizio
Programmazione Forestale, Perugia, Italy;
3
Aquaprogram s.r.l., Vicenza, Italy;
4
Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita, Universit a
di Trieste, Trieste, Italy;
5
Bioprogramm s.c., Padova, Italy
Summary
Data of 31496 specimens of cavedano chub Squalius squalus
were collected in 89 different waterbodies distributed geo-
graphically throughout Italy and used to provide length–
weight and length–length relationship for this species. The
linear relationship between total length (TL) and standard
length (SL) was described by the equation TL
(cm) = 4.007 + 0.874 SL (cm). The resulting total length–
weight equation for cavedano chub in Italy was: log
10
W = À2.121 + 3.083 log
10
TL (cm).
Introduction
Analyses of length–weight relationships can provide impor-
tant insight into the ecology of a species and the assess-
ment of its populations (Froese, 2006). For example, it
allows between-region comparisons of life histories of a
certain species (Moutopoulos and Stergiou, 2002), or the
evaluation of biomass through length (Tsoumani et al.,
2006).
Cavedano chub Squalius squalus (Bonaparte, 1837) is a
cyprinid endemic in the Italian peninsula and the Balkans
(Skadar and Ohrid basins) (Kottelat and Freyhof, 2007),
inhabiting the intermediary stretches of the watercourses
(Lorenzoni et al., 2006).
Although it is one of the most widespread freshwater
fishes in Italy (Pompei et al., 2011), information on this
species in Italian waterbodies is limited (Lorenzoni et al.,
2011) also because it was assimilated with the congeneric
European chub S. cephalus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Giannetto
et al., 2012). It is only recently that studies based on mor-
phological and molecular analysis confirmed the separation
of cavedano chub and European chub into two different
species (Kottelat and Freyhof, 2007; Gigliarelli et al.,
2012), and no estimates on length–weight relationships for
this species are available in FishBase (Froese and Pauly,
2012).
The main aim of this study was to provide length–weight
and length–length relationship for cavedano chub S. squalus
in Italy.
Materials and methods
Length and weight data on cavedano chub were collected by
electrofishing in different waterbodies throughout Italy. For
all fish caught in the field, total length (TL in cm) was mea-
sured to the nearest millimeter and weight (W in g) was
determined with a digital balance to an accuracy of 0.1 g.
After measurement, all fish were released at the site of
capture.
Conversion of lengths measured in terms of standard
length (SL) to total length (TL) was done using the linear
regression model, developed by using all fish in the dataset
for which SL and TL measurements were recorded:
TL ðcmÞ¼ 4:007 þ 0:874SLðcmÞ
ðR
2
¼ 0:998; P < 0:001; n ¼ 1087Þ:
Weights and lengths were log transformed and the LWR
for the total sample was determined by the equation log
10
W = log
10
a + b log
10
TL (cm), where a is the intercept on
the Y-axis of the regression curve and b is the regression
coefficient. The difference between the value of b of the
LWR and the value of isometric growth (b = 3) were then
compared by t-test. Finally, a LWR was determined for each
population separately and a linear plot between the slopes
(b) against all intercepts (a) of all populations was calcu-
lated.
Results and discussion
During the research 31496 specimens were analyzed from 89
waterbodies throughout Italy. Captured fish ranged in size
from 2 to 49.4 cm (mean Æ SE = 147.973 cm Æ 80.042) and
in weight from 0.1 to 1855 g (mean Æ SE = 66.9 g Æ
118.005). The LWR based on the total dataset was:
log
10
W ¼À2:121 þ 3:083 log
10
TLðcmÞ
ðR
2
¼ 0:986; P < 0:001; TL range 2–49:4 cm; n ¼ 31496Þ:
The value of b of the LWR (3.083) was higher than 3,
indicating an isometric growth. This emphasized a positive
J. Appl. Ichthyol. (2013), 1–2
© 2013 Blackwell Verlag GmbH
ISSN 0175–8659
Received: April 17, 2013
Accepted: October 10, 2013
doi: 10.1111/jai.12384
Applied Ichthyology
Journal of