Recovering biomethane and nutrients from anaerobic digestion of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) and its co-digestion with fruit and vegetable waste M. A. Hernández-Shek, L. S. Cadavid-Rodríguez, I. V. Bolaños and A. C. Agudelo-Henao ABSTRACT The potential to recover bioenergy from anaerobic digestion of water hyacinth (WH) and from its co-digestion with fruit and vegetable waste (FVW) was investigated. Initially, biogas and methane production were studied using the biochemical methane potential (BMP) test at 2 g volatile solids (VS) L 1 of substrate concentration, both in the digestion of WH alone and in its co-digestion with FVW (WH-FVW ratio of 70:30). Subsequently, the biogas production was optimized in terms of total solids (TS) concentration, testing 4 and 6% of TS. The BMP test showed a biogas yield of 0.114 m 3 biogas kg 1 VS added for WH alone. On the other hand, the biogas potential from the WH-FVW co- digestion was 0.141 m 3 biogas kg 1 VS added , showing an increase of 23% compared to that of WH alone. Maximum biogas production of 0.230 m 3 biogas kg 1 VS added was obtained at 4% of TS in the co-digestion of WH-FVW. Using semi-continuously stirred tank reactors, 1.3 m 3 biogas yield kg 1 VS added was produced using an organic loading rate of 2 kg VS m 3 d 1 and hydraulic retention time of 15 days. It was also found that a WH-FVW ratio of 80:20 improved the process in terms of pH stability. Additionally, it was found that nitrogen can be recovered in the liquid efuent with a potential for use as a liquid fertilizer. M. A. Hernández-Shek (corresponding author) COLCIENCIAS-Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Carrera 32 No. 12-00, Palmira, Colombia and Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Toulouse, 135 Avenue de Rangueil, 31400 Toulouse, France E-mail: mahernandezsh@unal.edu.co L. S. Cadavid-Rodríguez I. V. Bolaños Departamento de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Carrera 32 No. 12-00, Palmira, Colombia A. C. Agudelo-Henao Departamento de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Carrera 32 No. 12-00, Palmira, Colombia Key words | anaerobic digestion, biochemical methane potential (BMP), fruit and vegetable waste, renewable energy, water hyacinth INTRODUCTION Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) is an aquatic plant belonging to the pickerelweed family (Pontederiaceae). Native to Brazil, it occurs in several waterways and water storages in most countries of the world. It is a free-oating aquatic plant well known for its production abilities and removal of pollutants from water and as a reservoir of both energy and nutrients (OSullivan et al. ). This plant is considered as a noxious weed. According to (Malik ), it can quickly grow to very high densities (over 60 kg m 2 ), even to completely clog water bodies, which leads to serious problems in the preservation of water ecosystems and human activities like shing, naviga- tion, irrigation and power generation (Fernández et al. ; Epstein ). In order to control its aggressive growth, various efforts have been made, based on weed management methods such as physical removal, chemical methods (application of herbicides) and release of biological control agents. However, water hyacinth (WH) has success- fully resisted all attempts to its eradication (Malik ). Direct landlling of biodegradable material from municipal solid waste (MSW), as in the case of Colombia, poses lasting detrimental impacts to the environment and human health. Among the major issues are the consequen- tial emissions of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere and water and soil contamination (Nguyen et al. ). Accord- ing to the Ministry of Environment and Housing and Territorial Development (MAVDT ), on average MSW in Colombia contain an important fraction of biodegradable material, about 65% (wet weight), and the generation rate of this waste is increasing in time. Several efforts have been made in order to give effective solutions to these problems. In the case of WH, recent research has been focused not only on control methods but also on the utilization of technologies with signicant 355 © IWA Publishing 2016 Water Science & Technology | 73.2 | 2016 doi: 10.2166/wst.2015.501