Manganese(II) and Copper(II) Hexafluoroacetylacetonate 1:1 Complexes with 5-(4-[N-tert-Butyl-N-aminoxyl]phenyl)pyrimidine: Regiochemical Parity Analysis for Exchange Behavior of Complexes between Radicals and Paramagnetic Cations Lora M. Field, Paul M. Lahti,* ,† Fernando Palacio, and Armando Paduan-Filho § Contribution from the Department of Chemistry, UniVersity of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Arago ´ n, CSIC-UniVersidad de Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain, and Instituto de Fisica, UniVersidade de Sa ˜ o Paulo, Sa ˜ o Paulo, Brazil Received January 28, 2003; E-mail: lahti@chemistry.umass.edu Abstract: Mn(hfac)2 and Cu(hfac)2 form coordination complexes with 5-(4-[N-tert-butyl-N-aminoxyl]phenyl)- pyrimidine, PyrimPh-NIT. (Mn[PyrimPh-NIT](hfac)2)2 and (Cu[PyrimPh-NIT](hfac)2)2, 1 and 2, respectively, are cyclic M2L2 dimers that exhibit strong exchange coupling between the coordinated paramagnetic dication (M) and nitroxide (NIT) unit. The M-NIT exchange is strongly antiferromagnetic (AFM) in 1 and strongly ferromagnetic (FM) in 2. Magnetic susceptibility measurements for 1 were fitted to an AFM spin pairing model with J/k )-0.25 K between Mn-NIT spin sites units. Complex 2 also exhibits AFM spin pairing between S ) 1 Cu-NIT spin units that is somewhat field dependent at low temperature. The fit of corrected paramagnetic susceptibility (T) to an AFM spin pairing model at 200 Oe yields J/k ) (-)3.8 K, quite similar to earlier measurements at 1000 Oe yielding J/k ) (-)5.0 K. At 1.40 K, the magnetization of 2 does not approach saturation until somewhat above 170 kOe, giving an S-shaped curve; at 0.55 K, the magnetization curve shows steps characteristic of field-induced crossover between the S ) 0 ground state and excited spin states. From the steps in the 0.55 K data, we estimate J/k ) (-)3.8-4.0 K for 2, in good agreement with the analysis of (T). Introduction One very promising strategy for the design and synthesis of molecular magnetic materials is to combine paramagnetic cations with organic open-shell molecules to make hybrid systems. Nitronylnitroxides, nitroxides, and verdazyls have all been coordinated with paramagnetic ions to make hybrid materials with varying types of magnetic behavior. 1 Various qualitative models for understanding spin density distribution in organic radicals and polyradicals have been combined with overlap models incorporating the magnetic spin-orbitals of transition metals, as part of efforts to predict the magnetic behavior of the hybrid molecular magnetic materials. Such materials com- bine the increased magnetic moment of transition metals with the structural control of organic chemistry. A particularly useful feature of this strategy is that even antiferromagnetic (AFM) exchange coupling between transition metal and organic building block can lead to a material with a net magnetic moment, so long as the transition metal has a higher spin moment than the coordinated organic fragment. In this article, we describe the crystallography and magnetic behavior of two coordination complexes formed between manganese(II) hexafluoroacetylacetonate/copper(II) hexa- fluoroacetylacetonate and the conjugated radical 5-(4-[N-tert- butyl-N-aminoxyl]phenyl)pyrimidine (PyrimPh-NIT): 1:1 cy- clic, dimeric complexes[Mn(PyrimPh-NIT)(hfac) 2 ] and [Cu- (PyrimPh-NIT)(hfac) 2 ], 1 and 2, respectively. We shall refer to these complexes as 1:1 complexes because of the ion-to-radical ratio, although they are structurally M 2 L 2 type complexes. A preliminary account of some of these results has been published elsewhere. 2 Results Figure 1 summarizes the syntheses of complexes 1 and 2. Silyl-protected hydroxylamine 3 was converted to boronic acid 4, subjected to palladium-catalyzed coupling with 5-bromopy- rimidine to give 5, and deprotected to hydroxylamine 6. The hydroxylamine was oxidized with lead dioxide to give large, University of Massachusetts. CSIC-Universidad de Zaragoza. § Universidade de Sa ˜o Paulo. (1) For general references, see the following: (a) Kahn, O. Molecular Magnetism; VCH: New York, 1993. (b) Iwamura, H.; Inoue, K.; Hayamizu, T. Pure Appl. Chem. 1996, 68, 243. (c) Caneschi, A.; Gatteschi, D.; Sessoli, R.; Rey, P. Acc. Chem. Res. 1989, 22, 392. (d) Caneschi, A.; Gatteschi, D.; Sessoli, R. In Magnetic Molecular Materials; Gatteschi, D., Kahn, O., Miller, J. S., Palacio, F., Eds.; Kluwer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1991; p 215. (e) Gatteschi, D.; Rey, P. In Magnetic Properties of Organic Materials; Lahti, P. M., Ed.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1999. (f) Caneschi A.; Gatteschi, D.; Rey, P. In Progress in Inorganic Chemistry; Lippard, S. J., Ed.; Wiley: New York, 1991; Vol 39, p 331. (2) Field, L. M.; Lahti, P. M.; Palacio, F. Chem. Commun. 2002, 636. Published on Web 07/29/2003 10110 9 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 2003, 125, 10110-10118 10.1021/ja0343813 CCC: $25.00 © 2003 American Chemical Society