37
Development of a model for occipital xation—
validation of an analogue bone material
H Mullett1*, T O’Donnell 1, P Felle2, K O’Rourke1 and D FitzPatrick3
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St Vincent’s University Hospital, Dublin, Republic of Ireland
2 Department of Anatomy, University College Dublin, Republic of Ireland
3 Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College Dublin, Republic of Ireland
Abstract: Several implant systems may be used to fuse the skull to the upper cervical spine (occipito-
cervical fusion). Current biomechanical evaluation is restricted by the limitations of human cadaveric
specimens. This paper describes the design and validation of a synthetic testing model of the occipital
bone. Data from thickness measurement and pull-out strength testing of a series of human cadaveric
skulls was used in the design of a high-density rigid polyurethane foam model. The synthetic occipital
model demonstrated repeatable and consistent morphological and biomechanical properties. The
model provides a standardized enviroment for evaluation of occipital implants.
Keywords: synthetic model, occipital bone, biomechanical evaluation, implant
1 INTRODUCTION
In the current regulatory enviroment in the European
Union for cadaveric testing there is a need for stan-
dardized analogue material and models for testing and
validation of medical implants. Mechanical instability of
the upper cervical spine and the junction between cervi-
cal spine and skull represents a challenging clinical prob-
lem. Operative treatment requires fusion of the occiput
to the upper cervical spine (occipito-cervical fusion).
This is a technically demanding procedure with signi-
cant morbidity and mortality [ 1 –5 ]. Inadequate pur-
chase in the occipital bone (skull ) may lead to screw
backout or development of non-union with subsequent
failure of xation. Occipito-cervical fusion is most com-
monly performed for cervical rheumatoid arthritis where
osteoporotic bone, poor soft tissues and the patient’s
generalized debilitated condition increase the risk of fail-
ure. Failure of occipital xation may lead to non-union
rates of approximately 30 per cent [ 6 ]. Occipito-cervical
fusion has evolved from the use of simple onlay bone
grafts and wiring to sophisticated modular titanium
implants (see Fig. 1) [ 5, 7, 8 ]. Most recent authors agree
that internal xation is necessary with occipito-cervical
Fig. 1 Occipito-cervical fusion using modular implant system
fusion because union is di Ycult to obtain as a result of
the abundance of synovial tissue in the upper cervical
region. Concerns about occipital bone variability have
prompted alternative methods, techniques and place-
The MS was received on 21 May 2001 and was accepted after revision
ment of standard screw-plate designs. Occipital thickness
for publication on 9 October 2001.
has received only limited study and there is no consensus
* Corresponding author: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St
Vincent’s University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Republic of Ireland. as to which screw position is best. Heywood et al.[ 9 ]
H02901 © IMechE 2002 Proc Instn Mech Engrs Vol 216 Part H: J Engineering in Medicine