JOURNAL OF DEGRADED AND MINING LANDS MANAGEMENT Volume 10, Number 3 (April 2023):4537-4546, doi:10.15243/jdmlm.2023.103.4537 ISSN: 2339-076X (p); 2502-2458 (e), www.jdmlm.ub.ac.id Open Access 4537 Research Article Comparison of two landslide hazard zonation methods in the volcanic terrain of Temanggung Regency, Central Java, Indonesia Wahyu Wilopo 1,3* , Doni Prakasa Eka Putra 1,3 , Teuku Faisal Fathani 2,3 , Avantio Pramaditya 2,3 , Restu Tandirerung 4 , Egy Erzagian 1,3 1 Geological Engineering Department, Gadjah Mada University, Jl. Grafika No.2 Bulaksumur, Yogyakarta, Indonesia 2 Civil and Environmental Engineering, Gadjah Mada University, Jl. Grafika No.2 Bulaksumur, Yogyakarta, Indonesia 3 Center for Disaster Mitigation and Technological Innovation (GAMA-InaTEK) Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia 4 Geological Engineering Department, Papua University, Jl. Poros Waisai - Warsambin, Kota. Raja Ampat, Indonesia * corresponding author: wilopo_w@ugm.ac.id Abstract Article history: Received 30 November 2022 Accepted 22 January 2023 Published 1 April 2023 Landslides are a recurring phenomenon that disrupts the natural environment and causes yearly property damage, economic losses, and fatalities. The damage is expected to increase due to deforestation rates, population growth, agriculture, slope-building infrastructure expansion, and global climate change. This study assesses the susceptibility to landslides through Weight of Evidence (WoE) and Frequency Ratio (FR) methods in the Temanggung Regency, Central Java Province, Indonesia, that located on the slopes of two active volcanoes. Initially, a landslide record and the input parameters of the landslide controlling factors were prepared from field surveys, remote sensing data, and secondary data and processed by a geographic information system (GIS). Six landslide parameters in thematic layer maps were selected to develop landslide susceptibility: slope, lithology type, geological structure density, land cover, and rainfall. According to the WoE and FR models, a landslide susceptibility zoning map was classified into four landslide-prone zones from low to very high. Finally, the success and predictive rate curves method confirmed the landslide susceptibility maps to check the model accuracy. The results showed that the landslide susceptibility map using the WoE method had better accuracy than the FR method, with a success rate of 78.48% and a prediction rate of 81.1%. In comparison, the FR method was 74.53% for the success rate and 78.48% for the prediction rate. These landslide susceptibility maps can be used as a guideline to develop land-use planning and landslide disaster mitigation. Keywords: frequency ratio landslide susceptibility map Temanggung Regency weight of evidence To cite this article: Wilopo, W., Putra, D.P.E., Fathani, T.F., Pramaditya, A., Tandirerung, R. and Erzagian, E. 2023. Comparison of two landslide hazard zonation methods in the volcanic terrain of Temanggung Regency, Central Java, Indonesia. Journal of Degraded and Mining Lands Management 10(3):4537-4546, doi:10.15243/jdmlm.2023.103.4537. Introduction Landslide is a recurring hazard, and the frequency increases yearly. Climate change that triggers extreme rains and the increasing number of people living in mountainous areas will increase the number of fatalities due to landslides (Haque et al., 2019). In Indonesia, at least 40.9 million people reside in landslide-prone areas (BNPB, 2020). The community exposed to landslides in developing countries is mainly located in rural areas with low accessibility, low education, and economically included in the middle to lower class (Fathani et al., 2014). Regional planning and development that put landslides into consideration could minimize the risk of land degradation. One way to put landslides in regional