Tinjauan Yuridis Penyelesaian...-Wardah Yuspin dan Yurisvia Previlega Hatinuraya 69 TINJAUAN YURIDIS PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PEREKONOMIAN SYARIAH PASCA BERLAKUNYA UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 3 TAHUN 2006 Wardah Yuspin, S.H.,M.H.,Ph.D. 1 , Yurisvia Previlega Hatinuraya 2 1 Dosen Fakultas Hukum wy204@ums.ac.id 2 Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta Abstract T his paper examines the dualism of authority between the district courts and religious courts in resolving disputes of shari’a economy after the enactment of Law No. 3 of 2006 and Law No. 21 of 2008. Even when Law No. 21 of 2008 was submitted by the Judicial Review to the Constitutional Court and have been legally binding with No. 93 / PUU-X / 2012 in such decision has been made that explanation of Article 55 (2) does not have a binding force. So that the choice of forum to resolve the authority disputes prosecuting the Islamic economy remains the absolute authority of religious courts. Nevertheless until the mid-2016 it still remains the person submitting the sharia economic disputes in court. 7KLVVWXG\ZLOOｿQGRXWDERXWWKHIDFWRUVWKDWLQﾀXHQFHWKHWHQGHQF\IRUSHRSOHZKRKDYH disputes of sharia economy in choosing a court that would resolve the dispute. The research is a qualitative with the empirical juridical approach. This study uses a case study with purposive sampling which is handling the case of Islamic economy dispute in Religious Courts of Surakarta and Sukoharjo, with the number of respondents as many as 40 people made up of the sources that interact directly with the case against sharia economics such as: judges, both of district and religious court judge, the parties to the dispute in the case of sharia economy and the Islamic bank. By the respondents above there are 37 respondents can be used as a data source, while 3 respondents declared could not be processed due to LQFRPSOHWHUHVSRQVHV%\WKHUHVXOWRIUHVHDUFKLWFDQEHLGHQWLｿHGWKHWHQGHQF\RIVRFLHW\LQ the settlement of disputes sharia economy after the enactment of Law No. 3 of 2006 and the DQDO\VLVRIWKHHৼHFWLYHQHVVRIWKHLPSOHPHQWDWLRQRIWKH$FW7KHGLVFXVVLRQLQWKLVUHVHDUFK concluded that the Religious Court is entitled to resolve disputes sharia economy, although the District Court is still allowed to resolve them through civil law. However, due to sharia economic problems requires the ability of sharia or Islamic law which is strong enough to get it done, then the Religious Courts would be more appropriate for the trial. Meanwhile based on the results of interviewing 37 respondents, it can be concluded that there are more people believe to use the Religious Courts than District Court to resolve the sharia economy disputes Because of Environmental Factors, religious factors, and economic factors. Keywords: Dispute Settlement, Shari’a Economy, Justice Competence Abstrak A rtikel ini merupakan hasil penelitian yang mengkaji dualisme kewenangan antara peradilan umum dan peradilan agama dalam penyelesaian sengketa perekonomian syariah pasca berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2006 dan UU Nomor 21 Tahun 2008. Bahkan ketika UU N omor 21tahun 2008 tersebut di ajukan Judicial Review ke Mahkamah Konstitusi dan telah berkekuatan hukum tetap dengan Nomor 93/PUU-;/2012 dalam putusan tersebut telah dinyatakan bahwa Penjelasan Pasal 55 (2) tersebut tidak memiliki kekuatan hukum mengikat. Sehingga choice of forum untuk menyelesaikan sengketa