Cytotoxic T-Cells From T-Cell Receptor Transgenic
NOD8.3 Mice Destroy -Cells via the Perforin and Fas
Pathways
Nadine L. Dudek,
1
Helen E. Thomas,
1
Lina Mariana,
1
Robyn M. Sutherland,
2
Janette Allison,
1
Eugene Estella,
1
Eveline Angstetra,
1
Joseph A. Trapani,
3
Pere Santamaria,
4
Andrew M. Lew,
2
and Thomas W.H. Kay
1,5
Cytotoxic T-cells are the major mediators of -cell destruc-
tion in type 1 diabetes, but the molecular mechanisms are
not definitively established. We have examined the contri-
bution of perforin and Fas ligand to -cell destruction
using islet-specific CD8
T-cells from T-cell receptor trans-
genic NOD8.3 mice. NOD8.3 T-cells killed Fas-deficient
islets in vitro and in vivo. Perforin-deficient NOD8.3 T-cells
were able to destroy wild-type but not Fas-deficient islets
in vitro. These results imply that NOD8.3 T-cells use both
pathways and that Fas is required for -cell killing only
when perforin is missing. Consistent with this theory,
transgenic NOD8.3 mice with -cells that do not respond to
Fas ligation were not protected from diabetes. We next
investigated the mechanism of protection provided by over-
expression of suppressor of cytokine signaling-1 (SOCS-1)
in -cells of NOD8.3 mice. SOCS-1 islets remained intact
when grafted into NOD8.3 mice and were less efficiently
killed in vitro. However, addition of exogenous peptide
rendered SOCS-1 islets susceptible to 8.3 T-cell–mediated
lysis. Therefore, NOD8.3 T-cells use both perforin and Fas
pathways to kill -cells and the surprising blockade of
NOD8.3 T-cell–mediated -cell death by SOCS-1 overex-
pression may be due in part to reduced target cell recogni-
tion. Diabetes 55:2412–2418, 2006
T
ype 1 diabetes results from the selective destruc-
tion of insulin-secreting -cells within the pan-
creas. Autoreactive T-cells play a major role in
-cell death both in humans and in the NOD
mouse model of type 1 diabetes. Although efficient disease
progression requires both CD4
+
and CD8
+
T-cells (1,2),
the relative contribution of effector mechanisms used by
these activated T-cells is unclear. Evidence from the NOD
mouse implicates perforin, a major component of the lytic
granules of cytotoxic T-cells (CTLs) and natural killer
cells, as an important mediator of -cell death. Although
genetic deficiency of perforin significantly reduces the
incidence of diabetes in NOD mice, a small percentage of
knockout animals still develop disease (3). Proinflamma-
tory cytokines such as interferon (IFN)-, tumor necrosis
factor-, and interleukin-1 are important candidates in
non-perforin– dependent killing. Combinations of these
cytokines are toxic to -cells in vitro (4) and may enhance
recognition of -cells by upregulation of major histocom-
patibility complex (MHC) class I molecules and cell death
receptors including Fas.
We have studied the effector mechanisms utilized by a
population of CD8
+
T-cells recognizing an epitope within
the islet-specific glucose 6-phosphatase catalytic subunit–
related protein (IGRP). In wild-type NOD mice, up to 40%
of CD8
+
T-cells infiltrating the islets recognize IGRP
before the onset of disease (5– 8). Quantitation of IGRP-
specific T-cells in the peripheral blood using MHC class I
tetramers can be used to predict which NOD mice will
develop diabetes (9), suggesting that this is an important
T-cell specificity in the NOD model. The expression of an
IGRP-specific T-cell receptor (TCR) in NOD mice
(NOD8.3) accelerates the onset and increases the inci-
dence of spontaneous disease (10). Such TCR transgenic
mice provide simplified models of diabetes in which the
contribution of a single population of CD4
+
or CD8
+
T-cells can be studied in isolation. These mice develop
diabetes with high disease penetrance and at an acceler-
ated rate but provide a basis for understanding the mech-
anisms involved in nontransgenic mice and possibly in
humans.
We have previously reported that overexpression of
suppressor of cytokine signaling-1 (SOCS-1) in -cells of
NOD8.3 mice completely prevents diabetes, although in-
sulitis and T-cell activation appear to proceed normally
(11). We have now analyzed the effector mechanisms used
by 8.3 T-cells to understand which of these can be blocked
by SOCS-1 in vivo. The surprising result is that 8.3 T-cells
clearly use both the perforin-granzyme and Fas pathways
to kill -cells, indicating that both of these pathways are
blocked by overexpression of SOCS-1.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
NOD mice expressing a SOCS-1 transgene under the control of the rat insulin
promoter (RIP-SOCS-1) (11) and NOD8.3 mice expressing the TCR rear-
rangements of the H-2K
d
–restricted, -cell–reactive, CD8
+
T-cell clone NY8.3
have been described (12). Perforin knockout NOD mice were obtained from
The Jackson Laboratories type 1 diabetes repository and crossed to NOD8.3
transgenic mice (NOD8.3.PO
o/o
). NODlpr (13), RIP-B7-NOD.scid (14), RIP-
From
1
St. Vincent’s Institute, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia; the
2
Walter and Eliza
Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; the
3
Peter
MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; the
4
Julia
McFarlane Diabetes Research Center and Department of Microbiology and
Infectious Disease, University of Calgary Faculty of Medicine, Calgary,
Alberta, Canada; and
5
The University of Melbourne Department of Medicine,
St. Vincent’s Hospital, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Professor Thomas W.H.
Kay, St. Vincent’s Institute, 41 Victoria Parade, Fitzroy, Victoria 3065, Austra-
lia. E-mail: tkay@svi.edu.au.
Received for publication 24 January 2006 and accepted in revised form 8
June 2006.
CTL, cytotoxic T-cell; dn, dominant-negative; FasL, Fas ligand; FADD,
Fas-associated death domain; IGRP, islet-specific glucose 6-phosphatase
catalytic subunit–related protein; IFN, interferon; MHC, major histocompati-
bility complex; PLN, pancreatic lymph node; RIP, rat insulin promotor;
SOCS-1, suppressor of cytokine signaling-1; TCR, T-cell receptor.
DOI: 10.2337/db06-0109
© 2006 by the American Diabetes Association.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page
charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance
with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
2412 DIABETES, VOL. 55, SEPTEMBER 2006
Downloaded from http://diabetesjournals.org/diabetes/article-pdf/55/9/2412/655463/zdb00906002412.pdf by guest on 09 February 2024