Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology 8(8): 10091021, 2014 DOI:10.19026/rjaset.8.1063 ISSN: 20407459; eISSN: 20407467 © 2014 Maxwell Scientific Publication Corp. Submitted: May 09, 2014 Accepted: June 08, 2014 Published: August 25, 2014   Sara Bakkali, LRI, Performance Evaluation Team, Faculty of Sciences of Rabat, MohammedV AGDAL University, Rabat, Morocco This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). 1009            Sara Bakkali, Hafssa Benaboud and Mouad Ben Mamoun LRI, Performance Evaluation Team, Faculty of Sciences of Rabat, MohammedV AGDAL University, Rabat, Morocco ! This study discusses various problems of interdomain routing with Quality of Service and gives an overview of the currently proposed solutions. The problem arises when the traffic must pass through different Autonomous Systems and therefore the quality of service requested cannot be guaranteed. Several studies and solutions have been made to improve the endtoend quality of service. We classify these solutions in this study into two categories: theoretical and technical solutions. We present the main proposed solutions for each category and we show the performance and limitations of each solution. " Interdomain routing, path computation, precomputation path algorithms, quality of service #$%$# Today, one of complex challenges that Internet Service Providers (ISPs) are faced to, is to assure the Quality of Service (QoS) for Internet’s user. That means to guarantee the same QoS parameters to the customer, knowing that their traffic across networks of another ISP. Various studies have been conducted to solve the problem of interdomain routing with QoS constraints. In this study, we present various aspects of this problem and also a several proposed solutions to date. The proposed solutions can be classified into two main classes. $ & ’  Mainly based on algorithms for computing a path that satisfies the various constraints imposed by the different traversed domains. We present algorithms solving the problem of multipleconstraints routing, starting with the basic ones used in the intradomain case and then, we present those used in interdomain routing case. $  Are mainly extensions or improvements of existing technologies. Indeed, several solutions that have been proposed are based on operational technologies like Multi Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) (Rosen  , 2001) or Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) (Rekhter  , 2006). The reminder of this study is an overview of the interdomain multiconstraint routing problem and detailed description of the various solutions proposed to solve this problem. %$#( )$* %+$, - ./. # #$.0# %$#( Before discussing the various solutions proposed to ensure interdomain routing with constraints of quality of service, it is more appropriate to recall routing with QoS and to define the notion of interdomain routing.   1   QoS is a set of techniques used by the ISP to guarantee to clients that their traffics will be delivered to destination in the appropriate conditions. It generally covers two aspects: the temporal aspect (delivery delay) and the semantic aspect (data loss), which are expressed by four parameters: bandwidth (rate), transfer delay, variation of this delay (jitter) and finally, the reliability (loss rate). QoS is generally based on those parameters that have a different nature and which are intended to clarify the user needs to service providers. In summary, routing with QoS, or simply multi constrained routing, is to find a path between two nodes that respects the QoS constraints assigned to the client’s traffic. In what follows, we present the interdomain routing.   An Autonomous System (AS) corresponds to a routing domain under the control of a single administrative authority. The As’s, forming Internet, have to exchange their accessibility information, this is the objective of interdomain routing. Thus, each of border routers of the two autonomous systems in Fig. 1, must firstly establish connectivity with its neighbor and then, provide its information