laws
Article
Building Information Modeling in Quebec’s Procurement for
Public Infrastructure: A Case for Integrated Project Delivery
Gabriel Jobidon
1,2,
*, Pierre Lemieux
2
and Robert Beauregard
3
Citation: Jobidon, Gabriel, Pierre
Lemieux, and Robert Beauregard.
2021. Building Information Modeling in
Quebec’s Procurement for Public
Infrastructure: A Case for Integrated
Project Delivery. Laws 10: 43. https://
doi.org/10.3390/laws10020043
Received: 27 April 2021
Accepted: 20 May 2021
Published: 1 June 2021
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral
with regard to jurisdictional claims in
published maps and institutional affil-
iations.
Copyright: © 2021 by the authors.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
4.0/).
1
CIRCERB–CRMR, Université Laval, 2325 Rue de l’Université, Ville de Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
2
Faculty of Law, Université Laval, 2325 Rue de l’Université, Ville de Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada;
pierre.lemieux@fd.ulaval.ca
3
Academic and Student Affairs, Université Laval, 2320 Rue des Bibliothèques,
Ville de Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada; vice-recteur@vre.ulaval.ca
* Correspondence: gabriel.jobidon.1@ulaval.ca; Tel.: +1-581-992-6478
Abstract: The Province of Quebec is currently in the process of adopting building information
modeling (BIM) for major infrastructure projects. However, legal and contractual concerns such as
the tendering process, adjudication criteria, intellectual property and risk–reward sharing mecha-
nisms hinder the implementation of an efficient BIM process. This paper addresses the following
question: How do norms, whether legislative, regulatory or contractual, functionally or dysfunc-
tionally affect the effective implementation of BIM in Quebec’s public infrastructure framework?
This paper suggests that the use of Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) should help mitigate legal
barriers hindering BIM implementation, while preserving balance between fairness and encouraging
collaboration. Quebec’s normative framework, which includes legislation, regulations, contracts
and infra-regulatory rules, should be modified to standardize collaborative mechanisms, integrate
two-stage negotiated processes such as rank-and-run or best and final offer and enable the assessment
of tenderers’ objective qualities and more subjective qualities. Furthermore, a risk–reward sharing
mechanism should be implemented through target costing, and upstream participation from a wide
range of stakeholders should be encouraged.
Keywords: building information modeling; integrated project delivery; public procurement; collabo-
ration; infrastructure contracts
1. Introduction
In the past two decades, the productivity of the Canadian manufacturing industry has
nearly doubled, whereas in construction it remained stagnant (McKinsey & Company 2017).
To help achieve better productivity, the construction industry has turned towards build-
ing information modeling (BIM) (Succar 2009). BIM is a digital technology to establish
a computable representation of all the physical and functional characteristics of a facil-
ity and its related project/life-cycle information, intended to be a repository of infor-
mation for the facility owner/operator to use and maintain throughout the life-cycle
of the facility (NBIMS 2007). The BIM process is essentially a method to align design
members of a construction project and ensure their collaboration through information-
sharing, notably through a multi-dimensional 3D model providing visual and physical
properties of the asset, which can be used throughout the life-cycle of the infrastructure
(Attrill and Mickovski 2020).
BIM maturity levels are defined within a range from 0 to 3. Level 0 means no collabora-
tion and the use of traditional 2D drafting, while level 1 implies low collaboration between
different stakeholders who are individually responsible for creating and managing their
own data. Level 2 promotes collaborative working by ensuring each party is responsible
for a 3D model which will then be combined in a federated BIM Model. Level 3 BIM
involves multidisciplinary work and needs contractual frameworks encouraging open
Laws 2021, 10, 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws10020043 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/laws