Journal of Environmental Management 269 (2020) 110838
Available online 30 May 2020
0301-4797/© 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Research article
Use of biomass ash to reduce toxicity affecting soil bacterial community
growth due to tetracycline antibiotics
V. Sant� as-Miguel
a, *
, M.J. Fern� andez-Sanjurjo
b
, A. Nú~ nez-Delgado
b
, E.
�
Alvarez-Rodríguez
b
,
M. Díaz-Ravi ~ na
c
, M. Arias-Est� evez
a
, D. Fern� andez-Calvi ~ no
a
a
�
Area de Edafoloxía e Química Agrícola, Facultade de Ciencias, Universidade de Vigo, As Lagoas 1, 32004, Ourense, Spain
b
Departamento de Edafoloxía e Química Agrícola, Escola Polit� ecnica Superior de Enxe~ naría, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Campus Univ, 27002, Lugo, Spain
c
Departamento de Bioquímica del Suelo, Instituto de Investigaciones Agrobiol� ogicas de Galicia (IIAG/CSIC), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
A R T I C L E INFO
Keywords:
Biomass ash
Chlortetracycline
Leucine incorporation
Oxytetracycline
Tetracycline
ABSTRACT
Tetracycline antibiotics (TA) used in veterinary medicine reach terrestrial ecosystems mostly via the repeated
applications of animal manures and slurries on agricultural soils, where they may cause toxic effects on bacterial
communities. In the current work, we studied the effcacy of adding doses of 0, 6, 24 and 48 g kg
1
of biomass
ash (BA) to four different soils to reduce potential negative effects of tetracycline antibiotics. Specifcally, soil
samples were polluted with different concentrations of tetracycline, oxytetracycline or chlortetracycline, and the
bacterial community growth was estimated using the
3
H leucine incorporation technique. Soil amendment with
BA increased soil pH (1.3–4.8 units), total carbon (0.7–5.8 g kg
1
) and Fe and Al oxides concentrations
(0.25–3.98 g kg
1
), as well as bacterial activity (1–9 times compared to the control). In addition, BA amendment
at high doses (24 or 48 g kg
1
) resulted in a similar toxicity decrease for the three antibiotics, but with variations
among soils. The reductions in antibiotics toxicity were very variable, ranging between 5% and 100% (total
recovery). In view of that, the spreading of BA could be interesting as management practice to reduce risks of soil
pollution and subsequent toxicity on bacterial communities due to tetracycline antibiotics.
1. Introduction
Veterinary antibiotics are widely used for animal health, and even as
animal growth promoters in countries where this parallel use is not
banned (Anderson et al., 2005). These antibiotics reach terrestrial eco-
systems via the repeated applications of animal manures and slurries as
amendments on agricultural soils (Pan and Chu, 2017). Once in the soil,
veterinary antibiotics may cause harmful effects on non-target organ-
isms, such as soil bacterial communities (Warman, 1980). The presence
of antibiotics in the soil may cause a reduction in microbial biodiversity
(Thiele-Bruhn and Beck, 2005; Hammesfahr et al., 2008), infuence the
growth and enzymatic activities of bacterial communities (Liu et al.,
2009; Ma et al., 2016; Song et al., 2017; Sant� as-Miguel et al., 2020), and
hence, ecological functions and functional stability (Zielezny et al.,
2006; Demoling and Bååth, 2008; Pallecchi et al., 2008; Toth et al.,
2011).
Tetracyclines are the antibiotics most used in the European Union,
especially tetracycline, oxytetracycline and chlortetracycline (European
Medicines Agency. European Surveillance of Veterinary Antimicrobial
Consumption, 2016), which motivated that previous studies have
focused on the effects of tetracycline residues on soil microbial functions
(Thiele-Bruhn, 2005; Yang et al., 2010; Liu et al., 2012; Ma et al., 2016;
Song et al., 2017). It has been established that the main agents
responsible for the sustainability of soils are microorganisms (Pulleman
et al., 2012), since they are involved in nutrient cycles and renewal of
organic matter (Thiele-Bruhn et al., 2012). Therefore, the correct
growth of soil bacterial communities will help to maintain an optimal
soil fertility and organic matter turnover. However, there are only few
studies estimating the effects of tetracycline antibiotics on soil bacterial
community growth (Rousk et al., 2008, 2009a; Sant� as-Miguel et al.,
2020). These studies have shown a marked toxicity due to tetracycline
antibiotics, which was highly dependent on soil characteristics.
In order to prevent harmful effects of antibiotics accumulated into
soils, the use of appropriate waste and/or by-products as soil amend-
ments may be a low cost alternative aiding to decrease undesirable
toxicity affecting soil bacterial communities. It has been previously
* Corresponding author.
E-mail address: vsantas@uvigo.es (V. Sant� as-Miguel).
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Journal of Environmental Management
journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jenvman
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110838
Received 18 February 2020; Received in revised form 11 May 2020; Accepted 24 May 2020