FORUM Reconsidering meaning making and its analytical implications for cultural studies of science education Hans Christian Arnseth • Ingeborg Krange Received: 13 September 2012 / Accepted: 31 October 2012 / Published online: 11 December 2012 Ó Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012 Abstract The discussion in this forum aims to push some of the ideas further and thus clarify some of the concepts used in the feature article. This includes a debate of the concepts of meaning making, procedural and conceptual learning experiences, the dis- tinction between realism and constructivism in our research practice, and finally how to foster productive disciplinary engagement. Keywords Meaning-making Á Constructivism Á Dialogism Á Productive interaction We would like to take the opportunity to thank the reviewers for their very thorough and critical reading of our feature article, which not only have made us reconsider our text but also our analytical commitments more generally. We appreciate their reading as a way of pushing the issues further and of raising interesting aspects with practical consequences. For us it has been a true learning experience, to compare our writing to their extensive review. In this reply, we will try to comply with the ethos of this forum and abstain from simply defending our arguments from the criticisms raised. Instead we will use the opportunity to engage in dialogue and push some of the topics a bit further as well as clarifying some of the most important concepts used in our argument. First of all, let us make clear that we see ourselves as firmly embedded within a research practice inspired by sociocultural ideas and interaction analytic methods. In light of this, we were a bit surprised of the criticism raised that we would have retorted too easily in our analysis to constructivist dichotomizations between repre- sentations/signs and meanings as well as mind and world. We acknowledge that this critical reading is legitimate and that the reviewers provide reasonable arguments for the problems described, that is, that the conceptual categories, distinctions and methodological practices Lead Editor: C. El-Hani. H. C. Arnseth Department of Educational Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway I. Krange (&) Intermedia, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway e-mail: ingeborg.krange@intermedia.uio.no 123 Cult Stud of Sci Educ (2013) 8:489–495 DOI 10.1007/s11422-012-9468-1