International Journal of All Research Education and Scientific Methods (IJARESM), ISSN: 2455-6211 Volume 10, Issue 2, February-2022, Impact Factor: 7.429, Available online at: www.ijaresm.com IJARESM Publication, India >>>> www.ijaresm.com Page 1295 COVID-19 Pandemic and Rights of Migrants in India Sunita Tarai School of Political Science, Gangadhar Meher University, Amruta Vihar, Sambalpur ------------------------------------------------------------------*****************--------------------------------------------------------------- ABSTRACT This paper makes a case for analyzing the status of the migration, given such consequences, it is worth asking whether, and if so when, migration does represent a threat to human security. Common responses to this question are that migration can be a vehicle for importing global crime, trafficking in humans, instability in financial markets, threats to job security, the spread of disease, and internal conflicts. These are dangerously misleading perceptions, but nonetheless widespread. Such responses, in turn, can impact the migrants involved, for example, by denying asylum seekers access to safe countries, driving more migrants into the arms of migrant smugglers and human traffickers, and by contributing to a growing anti-immigrant tendency among the public, within the media, and in political debate in many countries (Knox, 2019). Coronavirus has been an exceptional challenge for pretty much every country. Because of the enormous size of the population, the hazardous place of monetary areas of the individual economies, and the economy's association on the casual work labor force, social removing measures and the lockdown has transformed into a troublesome issue for all migrants. In recent years, from a human rights perspective, a considerable amount of research has been used to study national and especially international migration. Key Notes: Covid-19, Migration, Human Security, Human Rights, Trafficking, INTRODUCTION Around the world, migration has become a universal human phenomenon. It was only systematically and globally brought to the forefront in the 20th century. In the past decades, the focus was on decolonization and the creation of numerous formal and often arbitrarily restricted nation-states, global war and mass movement of refugees, creation of the United Nations and its allies. Global migration is a phenomenon caused by different factors like economic, political, social, ecological, cultural, health, education, transportation factors, and security. The world is dynamic and constantly moving. Currently, an estimated 281 million people live outside their country of origin in the world in 2020, which is equal to 3.6 percent of the global population. Some have migrated in search of a better way. Others escape from the crisis of conflict and disaster or terrible poverty. For many, moving from one country to another is a complex process full of risks and uncertainties. In the whole world, there are many different academic conversations about immigration and immigration, but the main sociological conversation about immigration continues to focus on international immigration and nation-state integration. This paper seeks to bridge fragmented conversations and hierarchies of knowledge about migration and immigration, emphasizing some of the contours of the modern migration context. Raise awareness of political, economic, and social processes that shape the lives of migrants and immigrants, discoveries from research on forced movement, critical literature on cross-cutting and human rights, this monograph version emphasizes glocal. Migration may be a positive and empowering experience for many, but it is becoming increasingly clear that the lack of human rights-based immigration control at the global and national levels leads to routine violations of migrants' rights at borders of different countries/states. Migration from one place to another is not a risk, but the migrants may face human rights abuse. Migration and Human Security The 1994 HDR featured two significant parts of human security: 'freedom from fear‟ and „freedom from want‟. These independences from the introduction to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights are essential for the four human opportunities that President Franklin D. Roosevelt broadly alluded to in a discourse in 1941. He was pushing a world established on: opportunity of discourse and articulation, the opportunity of worship, freedom from need, and independence from fear. Subsequent banter during the 1990s added the freedom „to live in pride'(GASPER, 2013).