Vol.:(0123456789) 1 3
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05492-8
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
It is time to take action to prevent cardiovascular disease
in postirradiation head and neck cancer patients
Yu Chun Yeh
1
· Kai Min Fang
2
· Wan‑Lun Hsu
3
· Li‑Jen Liao
2,4,5
Received: 25 May 2019 / Accepted: 29 May 2019
© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019
Keywords Head and neck cancer · Irradiation · Cardiovascular disease · Statistical issues
Dear Editor,
Regarding our recent publication about the role of ultrasound
measurement of carotid intima-media thickness in head and
neck cancer survivors [1], we thank the readers for remind-
ing us of the possibility of estimation bias and sparse data
bias and suggesting some methods of avoiding these types
of bias. As suggested, we performed bootstrapping analysis
of our original data, and we showed the results of 1000-sam-
ple bootstrapping for the β-coefcients of multivariate lin-
ear regression in Table 1. The coefcient is 0.129 (95% CI
0.054–0.204) for irradiation related to mean carotid intima-
media thickness (CIMT), with the theory of regression to
the mean. After repeated bootstrapping analysis, we believe
the results further support our hypothesis.
Due to the limitations of a small sample size, we found
large odds ratios (ORs). We further used Firth penalization
to recheck the odds ratios for signifcant variables identi-
fed in multivariate logistic regression analysis; the original
published regression analysis results were compared to the
new results after Firth penalization in Table 2. We found
that the OR for developing cardiovascular disease (CVD)
after irradiation in patients with an abnormal mean CIMT
(≥ 1.0 mm, which indicates a risk of developing CVD) is
slightly diferent from the original published value; the new
OR is 7.53 (95% CI 1.36–41.81); however, the positive OR
still supports our hypothesis that irradiation to the neck is
an independent risk factor for CVD.
As mentioned in our publication, some previous studies
reported that irradiation for HNC wound-induced extracra-
nial carotid stenosis was associated with an increased CVD
risk [2–5].
Overall, our results and related published studies support
that irradiation to the neck is positively related to CIMT and
This comment refers to the article available at https://doi.
org/10.1007/s00405-019-05302-1.
* Li-Jen Liao
liaolj@ntu.edu.tw; deniro@mail2000.com.tw
Yu Chun Yeh
rambleurban@gmail.com
Kai Min Fang
u701048@gmail.com
Wan-Lun Hsu
lun0112@ms26.hinet.net
1
Department of Family Medicine, Far Eastern Memorial
Hospital, New Taipei, Taiwan
2
Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Far
Eastern Memorial Hospital, No. 21, Sec. 2, Nanya S. Rd.,
Banqiao Dist., New Taipei 220, Taiwan ROC
3
Genomics Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
4
Department of Electrical Engineering, Yuan Ze University,
Taoyüan, Taiwan
5
Biomedical Engineering Ofce, Far Eastern Memorial
Hospital, New Taipei, Taiwan
Table 1 Results of 1000-sample bootstrapping for the β-coefcients
of multivariate linear regression
β-coef. β coefcient, 95% CI 95% confdence interval, BMI body
mass index, HTN hypertension, DM diabetes mellitus
Risk factors β-Coef. (95% CI) P value
Age 0.006 (0.004 to 0.008) 0.001
BW 0.003 (0.001 to 0.005) 0.011
HTN 0.107 (0.024 to 0.179) 0.017
DM − 0.079 (− 0.215 to 0.079) 0.237
Hyperlipidemia − 0.012 (− 0.145 to 0.131) 0.845
Smoking − 0.023 (− 0.127 to 0.107) 0.688
Irradiation 0.129 (0.054 to 0.204) 0.001