Copyright © 2019 Mutaz B. Habal, MD. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Importance of Three-Dimensional Modeling
in Cranioplasty
Hasan Emre Aydin, MD, PhD,
y
Ismail Kaya, MD,
Nevin Aydin, MD,
z
Ceren Kizmazoglu, MD,
§
Feridun Karakoc, PhD,
jj
Hidayet Yurt,
jj
and Resit Bugra Hu ¨semoglu, MD
ô
Abstract: Cranioplasty is a reconstruction operation made to
protect intracranial structures. It is applied for the closure of bone
defects occurring due to causes such as trauma, tumor, infection,
and infarct. Many different products changing from autologous
bone grafts to synthetic materials are used for cranioplasty. Three-
dimensional printers that are among the popular innovations of
today are used gradually more in medical area as in every field of
life and they make the surgical operation easier. When customizable
materials are combined with technology, the authors come across
successful results and less complications. The aim of the authors’
study was to show a 3-dimensional modeling method in 2 patients
the authors applied cranioplasty and the advantages provided by this
method for the surgeon and the patient.
Key Words: 3-Dimensional modeling, cranioplasty,
reconstruction
(J Craniofac Surg 2019;30: 713–715)
C
ranioplasty is a reconstruction operation made to protect
calvarial remodeling intracranial structures and it is a severe
struggle for the surgeon applying the operation. Cranioplasty
operations are applied for the closure of bone defects occurring
due to trauma, tumor or decompression operations, or infection.
1,2
Different materials such as autologous bone grafts, alloplastic
materials such as titanium mesh, methyl methacrylate, calcium
hydroxyapatite and polyetheretherketone some of which can be
reconstructed easily, and porous polyethylene sheet are used in
cranioplasty operations.
3–6
Three-dimensional printers that are among the popular innova-
tions of today are used gradually more in medical area as in every
field of life. The symmetrical structure is preserved, and a better
image is acquired in cosmetic terms
7
with these printers. Materials
without any significant difference in use have become customizable
with 3-dimensional printers. The surgeon’s decision on which type
of material is to be used during surgery and which would be
appropriate is important.
8
Producing an exactly suitable model for the patient’s defect with
a 3-dimensional printer using computer-aided modeling through
preoperative axial 1-mm spiral computed tomography in patients
who should have cranioplasty, surgical difficulties were prevented,
and operation duration was shortened through preoperation simu-
lation possibility and thus its effect on surgical plan was presented
by the provision of patient satisfaction.
9
The aim of our study was to demonstrate 3-dimensional model-
ing method we applied to cover the calvarial defect in 2 patients and
the advantages provided by this method for both the surgeon and
the patient.
PATIENT 1
Images of the patient acquired through computed tomography (CT)
device were examined through free imaging software.
After the operated section of the patient’s cranium was exam-
ined, it was considered to make an individual molding from the
plastic material with 3-dimensional printers to acquire the most
suitable piece to be in the open cranial section with a nonuniform
shape of nearly 6.50 5.50 cm.
Design stages were discussed so that the desired mold could be
modeled using 3-dimensional design (CAD) programs and it was
decided that it could be designed as the following with the CAD
softwares (nonmedical) available in our laboratory.
In the radiological imaging, the open cranial section was in a
position perpendicular to the screen (monitor) and thus screenshots in
jpeg file format were captured. These images were loaded to a 2-
dimensional drawing program. To bring the image loaded on the
drawing program without any scale to its original dimensions, the real
distance between 2 points on the image captured from the cranium on
DICOM imaging software was taken as reference and the required
scale was applied on the image and it was brought to the scale of 1:1.
Then the control points in the cranial sections which should be
covered were determined in a 2-dimensional drawing platform and
the image of the mold from above was acquired through the B-
spline (NURBS) curve passing through these points (Fig. 1A). A 3-
dimensional solid model was acquired by giving a thickness of
15 mm in a CAD program using the drawn B-spline curve.
With the 3-dimensional modeling techniques and editing com-
mands, the final form of the mold was acquired on a 3-dimensional
solid model using these data (Fig. 2).
The solid model was transferred into stl format in suitable
resolution so that the 3-dimensional solid model of the mold to
be used for acquiring the piece to be in the cranium can be produced
on 3-dimensional printer.
Mold data in stl format was separated into layers (segments) of
0.25 mm with a software and was produced from ABS material in
segments on 3-dimensional printer using Fused Deposition Model-
ing (FDM) technology.
Methyl methacrylate (Synicem, Synergie Ingeniere Medicale
S.A. R. L. Z. A De Angle 19370 Chamberet France) used during
From the
Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty, Dumlupinar
University, Kutahya;
y
Department of Pharmacology, Medical Faculty,
Osmangazi University, Eskisehir;
z
Department of Radiology, Medical
Faculty, Dumlupinar University, Kutahya;
§
Department of Neurosur-
gery, Medical Faculty, Dokuz Eylu ¨l University, Izmir;
jj
Department of
Machine Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Dumlupinar University,
Kutahya; and
ô
Department of Biomechanics, Health Science Institute,
Dokuz Eylul University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.
Received December 19, 2017.
Accepted for publication September 26, 2018.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Ismail Kaya, MD,
Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty, Dumlupinar University,
Kutahya, Turkey 43040; E-mail: dr.ikaya85@gmail.com
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Copyright
#
2019 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD
ISSN: 1049-2275
DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005121
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Volume 30, Number 3, May 2019 713