© IJARW | ISSN (O) - 2582-1008 May 2024 | Vol. 5 Issue. 11 www.ijarw.com IJARW2122 International Journal of All Research Writings 45 EXPLORING PEER CORRECTION IN SPECIFIC WRITING GENRES: INSIGHTS FROM QUALITATIVE INQUIRY Phan Minh Huyen Thai Nguyen University of Economics and Business Administration ABSTRACT This qualitative research examines the intricacies of peer correction within specific writing genres, aiming to provide detailed insights into its impact on writing proficiency through collaborative learning. Through in-depth interviews and comprehensive surveys with language educators and students, the study uncovers multifaceted perspectives on the benefits, challenges, and best practices of peer correction in diverse genre contexts. The findings illuminate the nuanced dynamics of peer correction, highlighting its potential to enhance writing proficiency and facilitate meaningful learning experiences when tailored to specific genre requirements. Keyword: Peer Correction, Writing Genres, Collaborative Learning, Qualitative Inquiry, Writing Proficiency 1. INTRODUCTION Writing is a skill that we all use in various aspects of our lives, whether it's crafting essays for school assignments, drafting reports at work, or even just composing emails or social media posts. However, becoming proficient in writing requires more than just knowing how to put words on paper. It involves understanding different writing styles, mastering language mechanics, and effectively communicating ideas to different audiences. While traditional methods of writing instruction often rely on teachers providing feedback and guidance, collaborative learning strategies have gained attention for their potential to enhance writing skills. Peer correction, one such strategy, involves students reviewing and providing feedback on each other's writing. Through this process, students not only receive additional perspectives on their work but also develop critical thinking skills and become more actively engaged in the writing process (Topping, 1998; Hyland & Hyland, 2006). However, writing is not a one-size-fits-all endeavor. Various writing genres, such as persuasive essays, creative narratives, scientific reports, or poetry, have distinct conventions, purposes, and audiences. These differences pose unique challenges when it comes to implementing peer correction effectively. For instance, while the criteria for evaluating a scientific report may be more objective and straightforward, providing feedback on a piece of poetry may require a more nuanced understanding of literary techniques and personal expression. Understanding how peer correction functions within specific writing genres is essential for maximizing its benefits and addressing potential challenges. This study seeks to look into the dynamics of peer correction across a range of writing genres, exploring how it can be tailored to meet the needs and objectives of different writing tasks. By examining the experiences and perspectives of both educators and students, we aim to uncover valuable insights into the effectiveness of peer correction within diverse genre contexts. Through this exploration, we hope to not only contribute to the existing body of research on peer correction but also provide practical recommendations for educators looking to enhance their writing instruction. By understanding the nuances of peer correction within specific writing genres, we can better support students in developing their writing skills, fostering critical thinking, and ultimately becoming more proficient communicators in diverse contexts. 2. LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1. Peer Correction in Writing Instruction Peer correction, also known as peer feedback or peer review, is a collaborative learning strategy