Turning entrepreneurs into intrapreneurs: Thomas Cook, a case-study
Lisa Smith
a
, Patricia Rees
b
, Noel Murray
c, *
a
Gold Medal Travel, The Trident Centre, Portway Ribble Docklands, Preston, Lancashire, PR2 2QG, UK
b
Manchester Metropolitan University Business School (Retired), Apt 4, Bryn Cregin, Ty Mawr Road, Deganwy, Conwy, LL31 9UR, UK
c
Dept. of Marketing & International Business, School of Business, Cork Institute of Technology, Cork, T12 P928, Ireland
highlights
Entrepreneurship and intrapreneurship is investigated in Thomas Cook.
Entrepreneurs and Intrapreneurs have complementary skill sets.
Intrapreneurs are more financially risk averse than entrepreneurs.
With top level sponsorship, they achieve their goals by sometimes breaking rules.
Connecting Entrepreneurs and Intrapreneurs provides development opportunities.
article info
Article history:
Received 24 January 2014
Received in revised form
22 April 2016
Accepted 23 April 2016
Keywords:
Entrepreneurship
Intrapreneurship
Corporate environment
Travel business
abstract
The purpose of this paper is to understand how Thomas Cook can turn Entrepreneurs into Intrapreneurs
by: looking at the intrinsic and extrinsic motivators as well as the factors in a corporate environment that
are conducive to, and act as barriers against entrepreneurial behaviour. A case study approach was
adopted. Interviews were carried out with, amongst others, entrepreneurs and intrapreneurs in Thomas
Cook.
It was found that Entrepreneurs and Intrapreneurs have complementary skills, particularly in navi-
gating a corporate political environment. With top level sponsorship and support, they achieve their
goals by sometimes breaking rules. Connecting the Entrepreneurs and Intrapreneurs to engage with each
other, and utilising their skills for bigger and wider challenges, provides development opportunities for
both groups. Due to an embargo, the paper refers to research carried out in the late 2000's.
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Over the past thirty years there has been a growing interest in
understanding the enablers for organisations to be able to foster
creativity, innovation, self-renewal and entrepreneurship from
within (Burgelman, 1983; Kanter & Richardson, 1991; Abraham,
1997; Wunderer, 2001; Christensen, 2005; Jones, 2005; Brunaker
& Kurvinen, 2006; Gapp & Fisher, 2007; Chakravarthy & Lorange,
2008; Kacperczyk, 2012; van Wyk & Adonisi, 2012). This has been
in tandem with a subtle movement from using corporate entre-
preneurship descriptions towards heavier use of the intrapreneur
term throughout the 2000's (with movement back to the term
corporate entrepreneur more recently). Whilst there is research
conducted on intrapreneurs turning into entrepreneurs (Sharma,
2006) or intrapreneurs starting up new business ventures within
existing firms (Coulson-Thomas,1999; Hisrich & Peters, 1986) there
appears to be no literature addressing the reverse, turning entre-
preneurs into intrepreneurial players as part of a larger corporate
environment, or using proven entrepreneurial skills to aid new
business venture creation for the parent corporation, post the
acquisition process.
This paper investigates what strategy can be employed to
encourage previously independent and successful entrepreneurs to
behave intrapreneurially within, and for the benefit of a larger
corporate organisation. The research took place in Thomas Cook e
one of the world's leading leisure groups. This was prior to the
troubles the company encountered in 2011/12 and provides a
snapshot of the organisation at that time. (The implications of this
study and the later difficulties will be discussed as a postscript in
the conclusions). Whilst being a snapshot of events in the late
* Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses: ls@goldmedal.co.uk (L. Smith), p.l.nicholls@gmail.com
(P. Rees), noel.murray@cit.ie (N. Murray).
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Tourism Management
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/tourman
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2016.04.005
0261-5177/© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Tourism Management 56 (2016) 191e204