ORIGINAL ARTICLE Does it matter where you get your surgery for colorectal cancer? Mohammad Hamidi 1 & Kamil Hanna 1 & Pamela Omesiete 1 & Alejandro Cruz 1 & Agnes Ewongwo 1 & Viraj Pandit 1 & Bellal Joseph 1 & Valentine Nfonsam 1 Accepted: 17 October 2019 # Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019 Abstract Background The influence of hospital-related factors on outcomes following colorectal surgery is not well-established. The aim of our study was to evaluate the relationship between hospital factors on outcomes in surgically managed colorectal cancer patients. Methods We performed a 2-year (2014–2015) analysis of the NIS database. Adult (> 18 years) patients who underwent open or laparoscopic colorectal resection were identified using ICD-9 codes. Patients were stratified based on hospital: volume (low vs. high), teaching status, and location (urban vs. rural). Outcome measures were complications and mortality. Multivariate logistic regression was performed. Results A total of 153,453 patients with CRC were identified of which 35.3% underwent surgical management. Mean age was 69 ± 13 years, 51.6% were female, and 67% were white. Twenty-seven percent of the patients were managed at a high-volume center, 48% at intermediate-volume center while 25% at a low-volume center. Complications and mortality rates were lower in patients who were managed at high-volume centers and urban hospitals, while no difference was noticed based on teaching status. On regression analysis, patients managed at high-volume centers (OR 0.76 [0.56–0.89]) and urban hospitals (OR 0.83 [0.64–0.91]) have lower odds of complications; similarly, high-volume centers (OR 0.79 [0.65–0.90]) and urban facility (OR 0.87 [0.70–0.92]) were associated with lower odds of mortality. However, there was no association between teaching status and outcomes. Conclusion Hospital factors significantly influence outcomes in patients with CRC managed surgically. High-volume centers and urban facilities have relatively better outcomes. Regionalization of care along with the appropriate availability of resources may improve outcomes in patients with CRC. Level of evidence Level III, Retrospective Observational Study Keywords Colorectal cancer . Hospital volume . Urban . Rural . Teaching hospital Introduction Colorectal cancer (CRC) is considered as one of the leading causes of morbidity and cancer-related deaths nationally and worldwide. It ranks third in terms of overall incidence and cause of death in the USA [1]. In 2018, it is estimated that more than 1.8 million incident cases were diagnosed and ap- proximately 861,000 deaths due to CRC [2]. This makes CRC Poster Presentation at the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, June 2019; Cleveland, Ohio * Valentine Nfonsam vnfonsam@surgery.arizona.edu Mohammad Hamidi hamidi@surgery.arizona.edu Kamil Hanna kamilhanna@surgery.arizona.edu Pamela Omesiete npo@email.arizona.edu Alejandro Cruz acruz700@surgery.arizona.edu Agnes Ewongwo ewongwo@email.arizona.edu Viraj Pandit virajpandit@email.arizona.edu Bellal Joseph bjoseph@surgery.arizona.edu 1 Department of Surgery, University of Arizona Medical Center, Tucson, USA International Journal of Colorectal Disease https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-019-03436-6