Characterizing the impacts of vertical transport and photochemical ozone production on an exceedance area Emma L. Yates a, * , Laura T. Iraci a , David Austerberry a, 1 , R. Bradley Pierce b , Matthew C. Roby a, c , Jovan M. Tadi c a, 2 , Max Loewenstein a , Warren Gore a a Atmospheric Science Branch, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA b NOAA/NESDIS Advanced Satellite Products Branch Madison, WI 53706, USA c Department of Meteorology, San Jose State University, San Jose, CA 95192-0104, USA highlights Observation-based analysis of ozone (O 3 ) in California and consequences for air quality policy. Assessment of the seasonality of O 3 production above California's San Joaquin Valley. Evidence that free tropospheric air affects ground-level O 3 . Insights into O 3 transport which is difcult to identify by traditional modeling-based approach. article info Article history: Received 13 March 2014 Received in revised form 28 August 2014 Accepted 1 September 2014 Available online 2 September 2014 Keywords: Tropospheric ozone Air quality San Joaquin Valley abstract Offshore and inland vertical proles of ozone (O 3 ) were measured from an aircraft during 16 ights from January 2012 to January 2013 over the northern San Joaquin Valley (SJV) and over the Pacic Ocean. Analysis of in situ measurements presents an assessment of the seasonality and magnitude of net O 3 production and transport within the lower troposphere above the SJV. During the high O 3 season (May eOctober), the Dobson Unit sum of O 3 in the 0e2 km above sea level (km.a.s.l.) layer above the SJV exceeds that above the offshore prole by up to 20.5%, implying net O 3 production over the SJV or vertical transport from above. During extreme events (e.g. Stratosphere-to-troposphere transport) vertical fea- tures (areas of enhanced or depleted O 3 or water vapor) are observed in the offshore and SJV proles at different altitudes, demonstrating the scale of vertical mixing during transport. Correlation analysis between offshore O 3 proles and O 3 surface sites in the SJV lends further support the hypothesis of vertical mixing. Correlation analysis indicates that O 3 mixing ratios at surface sites in the northern and middle SJV show signicant correlations to the 1.5e2 km.a.s.l. offshore altitude range. Southern SJV O 3 surface sites show a shift towards maximum correlations at increased time-offsets, and O 3 surface sites at elevated altitudes show signicant correlations with higher offshore altitudes (2.5e4 km.a.s.l.). © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sets National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ground-level ozone (O 3 ). The 2008 NAAQS for O 3 requires that the 3-year average of the annual 4th-highest daily maximum 8-h mean mixing ratio be less than or equal to 75 parts per billion by volume (ppb) (US EPA, 2006). The California Air Resources Board (CARB) sets more stringent 1-h and 8-h O 3 standards at 90 ppb and 70 ppb respectively to better address longstanding O 3 problems (CARB, 2005). The formulation of attainable O 3 standards relies on the accurate identication of a representative baseline mixing ratio of O 3 that would occur in the United States in the absence of recent, locally emitted or produced anthropogenic pollution, as dened by the Task Force on Hemispheric Transport of Air Pollution (Dentener et al., 2011). Current baseline O 3 mixing ratios are estimated to be in the range of 15e60 ppb, with estimates varying based on model and experimental uncertainties, season, location and elevation (Fiore et al., 2003; Lefohn et al., 2011; Zhanget al., 2011; Lin et al., * Corresponding author. E-mail address: emma.l.yates@nasa.gov (E.L. Yates). 1 Now at: Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2143, USA. 2 Now at: Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stan- ford, CA 94305, USA. Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Atmospheric Environment journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/atmosenv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.09.002 1352-2310/© 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Atmospheric Environment 109 (2015) 342e350