Overcoming the 911 Fear Factor
Hector Caraballo, MD; Robert A. De Lorenzo, MD, MSM*
*Corresponding Author. E-mail: robert.a.delorenzo.mil@mail.mil.
0196-0644/$-see front matter
Copyright © 2014 by the American College of Emergency Physicians.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.12.006
A podcast for this article is available at www.annemergmed.com.
SEE RELATED ARTICLE, P. 545.
[Ann Emerg Med. 2015;65:553-555.]
Where to elect there is but one, / ’Tis Hobson’s
choice—take that, or none.—Thomas Ward, 1853
1
Someone encounters a person in cardiac arrest; ideally,
that observer calls 911 and initiates cardiopulmonary
resuscitation (CPR). This commonsense approach of
assisting an ill family member or fallen bystander seems
to carry minimal risk and does not require much self-
sacrifice. However, this ideal behavior may not occur in all
communities. Many perceive a Hobson’s choice when
faced with having to call the authorities to obtain aid,
fearing personal harm, loss of freedom, or economic
burden. Real or perceived, these fears threaten a key link in
the chain of survival.
Health disparities by race, income, and geography are
pervasive and complex.
2
Among the wealthiest countries,
the United States ranks last with regard to access to care for
individuals with low income.
3
Latinos experience increased
age-adjusted years of potential life lost for conditions
such as stroke, chronic liver disease, diabetes, and HIV
compared with non-Hispanic whites.
4
Residents of Latino,
black, and low-income communities have a higher
likelihood of experiencing an out-of-hospital cardiac
arrest, are less likely to receive bystander CPR, and are
less likely to survive.
5,6
The population of Latinos in the United States is
projected to increase from 54 million to more than 128
million by 2060.
7
The rapid growth and heterogeneity of this
population creates a challenge to clinicians, policymakers,
and researchers in meeting the health care needs of this
dynamic group.
8
Sasson et al
5
used qualitative analysis of
focus groups to explore the barriers and facilitators to CPR
and calling 911 in a mainly Latino community of Denver
County, CO. The neighborhoods targeted for analysis had at
least twice the incidence of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and
below-average rates of bystander CPR, according to data
collected with the intent of developing interventions for
specific high-risk neighborhoods identified in previous
publications. The authors concluded that the barriers to
calling 911 include (1) fear surrounding law enforcement
agents’ response in either implicating the bystander in
wrongdoing with regard to an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
victim or being detained because of legal issues surrounding
immigration status; (2) personal financial costs, immediate or
delayed, related to activating emergency medical services
(EMS); (3) 911 limitations in communicating with persons
possessing limited English proficiency; (4) worry over
misidentifying a cardiac arrest event for a less lethal problem;
and (5) fear of retaliation or isolation from friends, family, or
neighbors for involving the authorities. Not surprisingly, the
study suggested there was no distinction between law
enforcement agents and EMS personnel by this targeted
population. Additionally, the authors concluded there was a
lack of monetary resources to pay for both direct and indirect
costs related to CPR training, and also a lack of health literacy
surrounding cardiac arrest and benefits of CPR, which the
study suggests may be greater in recent immigrants and those
with limited English proficiency.
Sasson et al
5
used quantitative, data-driven, and
geographically focused methods to identify a high-risk
population for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest by zip code.
The effectiveness of interventions based on these data is
the next step in improving care in this targeted group.
The results of the study may not apply to all ethnic
subgroups, but the methodology is a model other
communities can use to gain insight and to guide efforts.
There are limitations in the study, including the cohort
assembly, which was 75% women; this may underrepresent
men and fail to identify barriers and facilitators in that part of
the population. It is also unclear whether the demographic
makeup of focus groups reflects the demographics of out-
of-hospital cardiac arrest individuals in those high-risk
neighborhoods. Factors such as country of ancestry or origin,
English proficiency, and immigration status may influence
barriers to calling 911 or initiating CPR in identified high-risk
communities. Emerging evidence suggests that data collected
broadly on Latino populations can overlook important
nuances with regard to disease rates and intervention
Volume 65, no. 5 : May 2015 Annals of Emergency Medicine 553
EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES/EDITORIAL