Effect of Atorvastatin on Postcardiac
Transplant Increase in Low-Density
Lipoprotein Cholesterol Reduces
Development of Intimal Hyperplasia and
Progression of Endothelial Dysfunction
Vincent Y. See, Jr., MD, David DeNofrio, MD, Lee Goldberg, MD, Gene Chang, MD,
Brett Sasseen, MD, Daniel M. Kolansky, MD, Faith Pickering, RN, Andrew Kao, MD,
Evan Loh, MD, and Robert L. Wilensky, MD
Following cardiac transplantation, accelerated coronary
disease limits long-term survival. Because statins may
reduce the progression of the disease in part by their
anti-inflammatory effects, this study was designed to
assess if atorvastatin prevented neointimal hyperplasia
and endothelial dysfunction independently of baseline
cholesterol levels. Patients were randomized to usual
therapy (n 13) or to 10 to 20 mg of atorvastatin (n
12). Control subjects received niacin when their low-
density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels were >130
mg/dl (n 4). Neointimal hyperplasia by intracoronary
ultrasonography, endothelial dependent vascular reac-
tivity, and coronary flow reserve were measured at
baseline and 1 year. Control group total cholesterol (203
11 to 200 13 mg/dl) and LDL (116 10 to 119
11 mg/dl) remained stable, whereas there was a non-
significant reduction at 12 months in the atorvastatin
group (total cholesterol 216 28 to 178 21 mg/dl;
LDL 126 17 to 100 18 mg/dl). At 2 to 3 months
there was a significant increase in total cholesterol and
LDL cholesterol that was reduced with atorvastatin. At 1
year, patients taking atorvastatin showed a decrease in
new or progressing lesions (2.5 1.7 vs 4.2 1.8
lesions/patient, p 0.02), progression of maximal in-
timal thickness (0.12 0.07 vs 0.52 0.17 mm, p
0.04), and percent area stenosis (5.9 2.2% vs 19.0
5.5%, p 0.04). Atorvastatin ameliorated progressive
endothelial dysfunction, whereas coronary flow reserve
was unchanged in both groups. Atorvastatin adminis-
tered to patients with normal or mild hypercholesterol-
emia in the initial year after transplant reduced the
initial increase in LDL cholesterol, and, by doing so,
prevented the development and progression of coronary
artery lesions and endothelial dysfunction with only mild
long-term decreases in cholesterol levels. 2003 by
Excerpta Medica, Inc.
(Am J Cardiol 2003;92:11–15)
T
he aim of the present study was to evaluate the
effect of atorvastatin on coronary lesion develop-
ment and endothelial function in the initial year after
transplantation, regardless of baseline cholesterol
level.
METHODS
Twenty-five patients who underwent cardiac trans-
plantation at the Hospital of the University of Penn-
sylvania between December 1997 and September
1999 were prospectively enrolled and randomized.
Patients were excluded if they were taking a statin or
had a history of statin sensitivity, liver dysfunction,
myositis, or active infection. Before discharge, pa-
tients randomized to atorvastatin were started on 10
mg/day regardless of their low-density lipoprotein
(LDL) cholesterol levels. The dose was increased at
follow-up to achieve a LDL cholesterol level of 100
mg/dl. Control subjects received niacin to treat LDL
cholesterol levels 130 mg/dl. All patients provided
signed informed consent and the study was approved
by the institutional review board of the University of
Pennsylvania.
All patients received standard immunosuppression
with cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and pred-
nisone. Two patients who could not tolerate mycophe-
nolate were switched to azathioprine, and tacrolimus
was substituted in 1 patient who could not tolerate
cyclosporine. An early prednisone taper was initiated,
with the goal of having all patients steroid-free 9
months after transplant. Routine surveillance endo-
myocardial biopsy scored by International Society of
Heart and Lung Transplantation criteria determined
rejection. Early ischemia was not evaluated in these
biopsy samples. Two patients who developed rejec-
tion associated with hemodynamic compromise were
treated with pulse steroids, and 1 required additional
From the Cardiovascular Division, Hospital of the University of Penn-
sylvania, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania; and Division of Cardiology, Tufts-New England Medi-
cal Center, Boston, Massachusetts. Dr. See was supported by an
Student Scholars in Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke Award from
the American Heart Association, Dallas, Texas. Manuscript received
January 7, 2003; revised manuscript received and accepted March
27, 2003.
Address for reprints: Robert L. Wilensky, MD, Cardiovascular
Division, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce
Street, 9 Gates, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4024. E-mail:
robert.wilensky@uphs.upenn.edu.
11 ©2003 by Excerpta Medica, Inc. All rights reserved. 0002-9149/03/$–see front matter
The American Journal of Cardiology Vol. 92 July 1, 2003 doi:10.1016/S0002-9149(03)00456-9