Flood-inundation modeling in an operational context:
sensitivity to topographic resolution and Manning’s n
Sarah Praskievicz, Shawn Carter, Juzer Dhondia and Michael Follum
ABSTRACT
Streamflow forecasts from operational hydrologic models can be converted into forecasts of flood-
inundation extent using either physically based hydraulic models or simpler terrain-based
approaches. Two factors that influence simulated flood-inundation extent are spatial resolution of
topographic data and in-channel and overland-flow roughness characterized by the Manning’s n
parameter. Here, AutoRoute, a raster-based flood-inundation model, was used to simulate two
recent flood events in Florida (a forested floodplain) and Texas (an urban floodplain) using two
different topographic resolutions and a range of Manning’s n values. The AutoRoute-simulated flood-
inundation extents were evaluated using observed extents from remotely sensed imagery.
For comparison, the same flood events were also simulated using a one-dimensional Hydrologic
Engineering Center River Analysis System (HEC-RAS) model. Results indicated that model
performance was much improved with higher topographic resolution for the forested floodplain site
and that the urban site was more sensitive to Manning’s n. For the three different rivers analyzed, the
fit for HEC-RAS was 5–10% higher than that for AutoRoute. Despite being only slightly less accurate
than HEC-RAS in its simulation of flood extent, AutoRoute was much simpler to set up and required
less computational time to run.
Key words | AutoRoute, emergency response, flooding, HEC-RAS, inundation modeling, Landsat
HIGHLIGHTS
•
Applies a simple terrain-based model for use in operational flood forecasting.
•
Compares the performance of a simple terrain-based model with that of a standard physically
based hydraulic model.
•
Uses the observed inundation extent from remote sensing to quantitatively validate model
performance.
•
Assesses model sensitivity to topographic resolution and Manning’s n.
•
Provides a framework that can potentially be adapted for near real-time operational flood
forecasting for large spatial domains.
Sarah Praskievicz (corresponding author)
Department of Geography, Environment, and
Sustainability,
The University of North Carolina at Greensboro,
237 Graham Bldg., 1009 Spring Garden St.,
Greensboro, NC 27412,
USA
E-mail: sjpraski@uncg.edu
Shawn Carter
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,
National Weather Service, Office of Water
Prediction, Water Prediction Operations Division,
205 Hackberry Lane, Tuscaloosa, AL 35401,
USA
Juzer Dhondia
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research,
National Water Center, Office of Water
Prediction, National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration,
205 Hackberry Ln., Tuscaloosa, AL 35401,
USA
Michael Follum
Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory, Engineer
Research and Development Center,
United States Army Corps of Engineers,
3909 Halls Ferry Rd., Vicksburg, MS 39180-6199,
USA
Current address:
Water and Civil Works Branch,
Wyoming Area Office, Bureau of Reclamation,
Mills, WY 82644,
USA
INTRODUCTION
Floods are among the deadliest and most destructive natural
disasters globally. To save lives and protect property, emer-
gency responders must have accurate, real-time, high-
resolution forecasts of flood-inundation extent. Such fore-
casts allow emergency responders to make the best
possible decisions about evacuations and staging of
resources (Fagan ). Because flood events range from
local to watershed-scale, efforts within the United States
are ongoing to develop operational hydrologic models that
can forecast streamflow for a continental domain, at high
1338 © IWA Publishing 2020 Journal of Hydroinformatics | 22.5 | 2020
doi: 10.2166/hydro.2020.005
Downloaded from http://iwaponline.com/jh/article-pdf/22/5/1338/763301/jh0221338.pdf
by guest
on 23 November 2021