Flood-inundation modeling in an operational context: sensitivity to topographic resolution and Mannings n Sarah Praskievicz, Shawn Carter, Juzer Dhondia and Michael Follum ABSTRACT Streamow forecasts from operational hydrologic models can be converted into forecasts of ood- inundation extent using either physically based hydraulic models or simpler terrain-based approaches. Two factors that inuence simulated ood-inundation extent are spatial resolution of topographic data and in-channel and overland-ow roughness characterized by the Mannings n parameter. Here, AutoRoute, a raster-based ood-inundation model, was used to simulate two recent ood events in Florida (a forested oodplain) and Texas (an urban oodplain) using two different topographic resolutions and a range of Mannings n values. The AutoRoute-simulated ood- inundation extents were evaluated using observed extents from remotely sensed imagery. For comparison, the same ood events were also simulated using a one-dimensional Hydrologic Engineering Center River Analysis System (HEC-RAS) model. Results indicated that model performance was much improved with higher topographic resolution for the forested oodplain site and that the urban site was more sensitive to Mannings n. For the three different rivers analyzed, the t for HEC-RAS was 510% higher than that for AutoRoute. Despite being only slightly less accurate than HEC-RAS in its simulation of ood extent, AutoRoute was much simpler to set up and required less computational time to run. Key words | AutoRoute, emergency response, ooding, HEC-RAS, inundation modeling, Landsat HIGHLIGHTS Applies a simple terrain-based model for use in operational ood forecasting. Compares the performance of a simple terrain-based model with that of a standard physically based hydraulic model. Uses the observed inundation extent from remote sensing to quantitatively validate model performance. Assesses model sensitivity to topographic resolution and Mannings n. Provides a framework that can potentially be adapted for near real-time operational ood forecasting for large spatial domains. Sarah Praskievicz (corresponding author) Department of Geography, Environment, and Sustainability, The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, 237 Graham Bldg., 1009 Spring Garden St., Greensboro, NC 27412, USA E-mail: sjpraski@uncg.edu Shawn Carter National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Weather Service, Ofce of Water Prediction, Water Prediction Operations Division, 205 Hackberry Lane, Tuscaloosa, AL 35401, USA Juzer Dhondia University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, National Water Center, Ofce of Water Prediction, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 205 Hackberry Ln., Tuscaloosa, AL 35401, USA Michael Follum Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory, Engineer Research and Development Center, United States Army Corps of Engineers, 3909 Halls Ferry Rd., Vicksburg, MS 39180-6199, USA Current address: Water and Civil Works Branch, Wyoming Area Ofce, Bureau of Reclamation, Mills, WY 82644, USA INTRODUCTION Floods are among the deadliest and most destructive natural disasters globally. To save lives and protect property, emer- gency responders must have accurate, real-time, high- resolution forecasts of ood-inundation extent. Such fore- casts allow emergency responders to make the best possible decisions about evacuations and staging of resources (Fagan ). Because ood events range from local to watershed-scale, efforts within the United States are ongoing to develop operational hydrologic models that can forecast streamow for a continental domain, at high 1338 © IWA Publishing 2020 Journal of Hydroinformatics | 22.5 | 2020 doi: 10.2166/hydro.2020.005 Downloaded from http://iwaponline.com/jh/article-pdf/22/5/1338/763301/jh0221338.pdf by guest on 23 November 2021