Inverse gradient of nitrergic and purinergic inhibitory
cotransmission in the mouse colon
N. Ma~ n e,
1
R. Viais,
2
M. Martınez-Cutillas,
1
D. Gallego,
1,3
P. Correia-de-S a
2
and M. Jim enez
1,3
1 Department of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology and Neuroscience Institute, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona,
Barcelona, Spain
2 Center for Drug Discovery and Innovative Medicines (MedInUP), Instituto de Ci^encias Biomedicas Abel Salazar da Universidade
do Porto (ICBAS-UP), Porto, Portugal
3 Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red de Enfermedades Hepaticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Instituto de Salud Carlos III,
Barcelona, Spain
Received 8 June 2015,
revision requested 9 July 2015,
revision received 1 September
2015,
accepted 2 September 2015
Correspondence: M. Jimenez,
VMD, PhD, Department of Cell
Biology, Physiology and
Immunology, Edifici V, Universitat
Aut onoma de Barcelona 08193
Bellaterra, Cerdanyola del Valles,
Spain.
E-mail: marcel.jimenez@uab.es
NM and RV are co-authors and
equally contributed to this work.
Abstract
Aim: Gastrointestinal smooth muscle relaxation is accomplished by the
neural corelease of ATP or a related purine and nitric oxide. Contractions
are triggered by acetylcholine and tachykinins. The aim of this work was
to study whether regional differences in neurotransmission could partially
explain the varied physiological roles of each colonic area.
Methods: We used electrophysiological and myography techniques to
evaluate purinergic (L-NNA 1 mM incubated tissue), nitrergic (MRS2500
0.3 lM incubated tissue) and cholinergic neurotransmission (L-NNA 1 mM
and MRS2500 0.3 lM incubated tissue) in the proximal, mid and distal
colon of CD1 mice (n = 42).
Results: Purinergic electrophysiological responses elicited by single pulses
(28 V) were greater in the distal (IJPf
MAX
= 35.3 2.2 mV), followed
by the mid (IJPf
MAX
= 30.6 1.0 mV) and proximal (IJPf
MAX
=
11.7 1.1 mV) colon. In contrast, nitrergic responses decreased from
the proximal colon (IJPs
MAX
= 11.4 1.1 mV) to the mid (IJPs
MAX
=
9.1 0.4 mV), followed by the distal colon (IJPs
MAX
=
1.8 0.3 mV). A similar rank of order was observed in neural mediated
inhibitory mechanical responses including electrical field stimulation-
mediated responses and neural tone. ADPbs concentration–response curve
was shifted to the left in the distal colon. In contrast, NaNP responses did
not differ between regions. Cholinergic neurotransmission elicited contrac-
tions of a similar amplitude throughout the colon.
Conclusion: An inverse gradient of purinergic and nitrergic neurotrans-
mission exists through the mouse colon. The proximal and mid colon have
a predominant nitrergic neurotransmission probably due to the fact that
their storage function requires sustained relaxations. The distal colon, in
contrast, has mainly purinergic neurotransmission responsible for the pha-
sic relaxations needed to propel dehydrated faeces.
Keywords colonic relaxation, nitric oxide, purines, regional differences.
Nerve-mediated smooth muscle contraction and relax-
ation are needed to accomplish several colonic motor
functions such as absorption, mixing, storage and
propulsion. Although excitatory enteric neurones
corelease other transmitters such as tachykinins (Hol-
zer & Holzer-Petsche 1997), acetylcholine (Ach) is
believed to be functionally predominant in inducing
contractions in the gut (Goyal & Hirano 1996,
© 2015 Scandinavian Physiological Society. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd, doi: 10.1111/apha.12599 120
Acta Physiol 2016, 216, 120–131