The Effect of Injection Immunotherapy on
Mucociliary Clearance in Allergic Patients
Ryan C. Cmejrek, MD,
a
Michael T. Gutman, MD,
a
Augusto J. Torres, MD,
a
Kevin J. Keen, PhD, PStat,
a,b,c
Steven M. Houser, MD, FAAOA, FARS, FACS
a
a
From the MetroHealth Medical Center, University Hospitals of Cleveland, and the
b
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Case Western Reserve University, and
c
University of Northern British Columbia.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of injection immunotherapy
on mucociliary clearance in allergic patients with the use of the
saccharin test.
METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, mucociliary clear-
ance in 42 allergic patients treated with injection immunotherapy
was determined with the saccharin test. Of these patients, 23 were
retested 1 year later to assess changes in mucociliary clearance
times. Mean results for historical controls were determined in a
review and meta-analysis of the existing literature.
RESULTS: Saccharin clearance times (SCTs) were initially pro-
longed in allergic patients who received injection immunotherapy
when compared to historical controls (one-sided P value 0.05).
However, after 1 year of immunotherapy, there was a significant
reduction in SCTs in our patient population. This finding was
independent of other evaluated patient characteristics, with the
exception of nasal steroid use, which was also significantly asso-
ciated with a decrease in SCT.
CONCLUSIONS: After 1 year of injection immunotherapy, there
was a significant reduction in mean SCT in our patient population. Of
the other factors studied, only nasal steroid was associated with
decreased mucociliary clearance times. To our knowledge, this is the
first report in the literature documenting the beneficial effect of injec-
tion immunotherapy on mucociliary clearance as measured by sac-
charin clearance times. Nevertheless, further research is warranted,
given the confounding effect of nasal steroid use.
© 2005 American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Sur-
gery Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved.
M
ucociliary clearance is a primary function of the up-
per airway. This process is an important aspect of the
first-line defense against infecting organisms, antigens, and
debris. Mucus that lines the nasal cavity acts to trap inhaled
particles. The trapped particles are then transported by a
coordinated action of cilia toward the nasopharynx where
they are swallowed or expectorated. This process of trans-
port is complex and dependent upon ciliary function and the
rheologic properties of mucus. Alterations in either can lead
to ineffective mucociliary flow.
There are a number of ways to measure mucociliary
clearance. Although the gold standard for measurement of
mucociliary clearance is the radiolabeled method,
1
a sim-
pler, safer, and efficacious alternative is the saccharin test.
2
Saccharin clearance time (SCT) has been documented in the
literature to assess mucociliary clearance in normal subjects
as well as in those with various sinonasal disorders, such as
allergic rhinitis (AR) and chronic rhinosinusitis.
3-5
However, mucociliary clearance in allergic patients un-
dergoing injection immunotherapy has not been studied by
SCT or by any other method (MEDLINE search, 1966-
present). In addition, factors that might alter mucociliary
clearance in these patients, such as length of immunother-
apy, antihistamine and nasal steroid use, history of sinonasal
surgery, and tobacco use, have not been fully elucidated.
Whether symptomatology and SCT are associated in these
patients is unknown.
Presented at the Middle/Southern Section Meeting of the Triological
Society, Marco Island, Florida, January 8-11, 2004.
Reprint requests: Ryan C. Cmejrek, Case Western Reserve University,
University Hospitals of Cleveland, Department of Otolaryngology–Head
and Neck Surgery, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106.
E-mail address: rcc4@alumni.case.edu.
Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (2005) 133, 9-15
0194-5998/$30.00 © 2005 American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2005.03.062