Review of: "Impact of Environmental Education on the Knowledge and Attitude of University of Benin Students towards Waste Segregation" Siba Théodore Koropogui 1 1 Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières Potential competing interests: No potential competing interests to declare. Thank you for writing and submitting your manuscript titled 'Impact of Environmental Education on the Knowledge and Attitude of University of Benin Students towards Waste Segregation' to Qeios. I am not an expert in environmental education. However, education speaks to me a lot and is a field of research in which I am active. Additionally, I am a specialist in experimental methods in education. Upon reading your manuscript, I had some reflections and observations which I summarize here. I approach these points according to the structure of your document. I hope they will assist you in your further work on this manuscript. Introduction Comment #1. Usually, it is desirable for a good introduction to engage the reader, clearly define the problem (theoretical or practical), and indicate what the study will add to our knowledge (Grant & Pollock, 2011). You address some aspects related to the problem motivating your research. However, it remains limited. Your introduction is more like a literature review. I suggest restructuring it. In the introduction, we would like to see why studying this topic is important for researchers and the world of education? Would there be a problem if this environmental education is not offered to students? Why should it be relevant to address by an empirical study? What would happen if no research is conducted on the topic? Comment #2. Furthermore, I notice that your introduction focuses more on what is happening in Nigeria while your study field is Benin. It would be desirable to present the situation in Benin to help better understand the research problem. Comment #3. The first sentence of paragraph 8 should be supported by a reference "Human behaviour is complex and humans will change their behaviors when sufficiently enlightened." Comment #4. Ideas should be presented in a logical sequence. For example, paragraph 9 deals primarily with the work of Babayemi (2010). What is mentioned there is identical to what is covered in paragraph 5 with the work of Ovoh (2015). I suggest that similar ideas be dealt with in the same places to avoid back-and-forth in the development. Comment #5. I notice that definitions are provided in several places in the introduction. I strongly suggest that this be addressed in the theoretical framework. Furthermore, this must be supported by references. Qeios, CC-BY 4.0 · Review, November 28, 2023 Qeios ID: O75TR9 · https://doi.org/10.32388/O75TR9 1/4