Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Fuel
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/fuel
Full Length Article
Kinetic modeling of biomass gasification and tar formation in a fluidized bed
gasifier using equivalent reactor network (ERN)
Bijoy Das, Atmadeep Bhattacharya
1
, Amitava Datta
⁎
Department of Power Engineering, Jadavpur University, Salt Lake Campus, Kolkata 700098, India
ARTICLE INFO
Keywords:
Biomass gasification
Pyrolysis
Kinetic modeling
Tar
Equivalent reactor network
ABSTRACT
A chemical kinetic based simulation model of a bubbling fluidized bed biomass gasifier has been developed using
an Equivalent Reactor Network (ERN). The pyrolysis zone is modeled using a thermodynamic equilibrium model
and a kinetic-controlled perfectly stirred reactor (PSR) placed in succession. The gasification zone and the
freeboard are simulated as perfectly stirred reactor (PSR) and plug flow reactor (PFR), respectively. A detailed
chemical reaction mechanism is used to describe the chemistry of reaction during devolatilization and gasifi-
cation stages. The formation and evolution of gaseous and tar species in different zones of the gasifier are
estimated and the major reaction paths have been identified. The influence of equivalence ratio (ER) on the
gasifier performance and tar species formation has been studied. Out of the three ERs considered (0.27, 0.24 and
0.19), the best performance of the gasifier is exhibited at ER = 0.24 in terms of cold gas efficiency.
1. Introduction
Biomass is a widely available, carbon–neutral energy resource that
currently accounts for more than 10% of the world's total energy con-
sumption [1]. One convenient way of extracting energy from the bio-
mass is through its gasification and then using the resultant fuel gas
either in internal combustion engine or in gas turbine engine to produce
electricity. However, as the energy content and density of the biomass
feedstock are low, the cost of the biomass transportation should be
considered in the economic assessment of biomass conversion tech-
nologies [2]. Therefore, the power generation from gasification of
biomass in small scale decentralized units is often a more economical
option than that in a large scale centralized plant [3,4]. Furthermore,
the emission indices of carbon monoxide (CO) and soot from a gasifier-
engine combined system operating on woody biomass remains negli-
gibly small [5]. Besides the gasifier and reciprocating internal com-
bustion engine couplings, there are a few works available in the lit-
erature on the gasifier and gas turbine combinations as well. Such
combinations may also be used in conjunction with steam turbines in
the integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) plants. A detailed
review of the usefulness of the IGCC technology involving biomass can
be found in Parraga et al. [6]. It has been identified in this review that
the biomass gasification process is quite complex and therefore its
modeling is a challenging task.
The fuel gas (named producer gas or syngas), produced through
gasification of biomass in air, contains hydrogen (H
2
), carbon monoxide
(CO) and methane (CH
4
) as the combustible components; in addition to
the other non-combustible components like carbon dioxide (CO
2
) and
nitrogen (N
2
). The syngas composition varies significantly with the
biomass feedstock, gasifier type and gasifier operating parameters [6].
It is an established fact that the performance of both the IC engine and
the IGCC plant depends strongly on the quality of the fuel gas produced
from biomass gasification [7,8]. The producer gas also contains tar,
which is a complex mixture of hydrocarbons heavier than benzene [9].
Tar is produced in the gasifier primarily during the pyrolysis of bio-
mass; and then it is subjected to secondary reactions. Different com-
pounds present in tar have been listed by Milne et al. [10] following the
work of Evans and Milne [11]. Tar is an unwanted constituent of the
producer gas, which adversely affects the quality of the fuel for its use
in engines and turbines. The tar constituents may condense to block the
fuel lines and particle filters in engines. They also result in the increased
emission of soot and UHC (unburned hydrocarbon) in the exhaust.
Therefore, reduction of tar in the producer gas remains an important
objective in the design and development of the biomass gasifier unit. A
recent review by Islam [12] has listed numerous catalytic materials that
are being researched upon for the tar removal process in biomass ga-
sification.
Another method of reducing the quantity of tar in the producer gas
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118582
Received 6 April 2020; Received in revised form 31 May 2020; Accepted 29 June 2020
⁎
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: amdatta_ju@yahoo.com (A. Datta).
1
Presently at Department of Mechanical Engineering, Aalto University, Finland.
Fuel 280 (2020) 118582
0016-2361/ © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
T