,- Ma11m, L C'., and I'. I kvim'. ·W111d1L .~Oil/, l'lon· allod111w111 111 l·lll·11w11111•111ttl / 1 ,\I' cho/ogy. An /11tmd11,·ti011, i·h:oml blitlo11, t!dih·d hv I Skg 1111d JLM di·< ho11L 135,-143. Hoboken: John Wiley&. Sous. doi: I 0, IOlUN/li 11 i•P·II 11/.'.l'h l•I. Pink, S. 2006. 'l11e 1'l1t11re 11/' Viwml A11lf1mpolt1gl', l:11gt1gi11g t/w S,·11.1,•s. Nrw York: H1 ,utl<'dpp Pink, S. 2009. Doing SensOIJ' Et/111ogmp!,y. Lomlnu: SA< ii•: l'11hlwalio11s. doi: J0.,111',/ 9781446249383. Price, P.L. 2013. Place. In The Wiley-Blackwell Co111pa11iuu w ( '11/111ml (kograplt!\ edited by NC. Johnson, R.H. Schein and J. Winders, 118 129. Chichester: Wik•y Blackwell. doi:10. 1002/9781 l 18384466.ch13 . Probyn, E. 2003. The spatial imperative of subjectivity. ln Handbook of Cu/tum/ Ueo, graphy, edited by K. Anderson, M. Domosh, S. Pile and N. Thrift, 290 '.NtJ. London: SAGE Publications. doi: l 0.4135/9781848608252.nl 4. Ralph, D. and L.A. Staeheli. 2011. Home and migration: Mobilities, belongings 11ml identities. Geography Compass 5: 517-530. doi:10.l l 11/j.1749-8198.2011.00434.x. Rapoport, A. 1969. House Form and Culture. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. Rodaway, P. 1994. Sensuous Geographies. Body, Sense and Place. London: Routledge. Sunderland, N., H. Bristed, 0. Gudes, J. Boddy and M. Da Silva. 2012. What does ii feel like to live here? Exploring sensory ethnography as a collaborative methodology for investigating social determinants of health in place. Health & Place, 18 (5): l 056--1067. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.05.007. Tucker, A. 1994. In search of home. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 11 (2): 181-187. Tveit, M.S., A. Ode Sang and C.M. Hagerhall. 2019. Scenic beauty: Visual landscape assessment and human landscape perception. In Environmental Psychology: An Introduction, Second Edition, edited by L. Steg and J.I.M. de Groot, 46--54. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. doi:10.1002/9781119241072.chS. van Mansvelt, J.D. and B. Pedroli. 2003. Landscape - A matter of identity and integ- rity. In Landscape lnterfaces: Cultural Heritage in Changing Landscapes, edited by H. Palang and G. Fry, 375-394. Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-0l 7-0189· 1_19. Walker, L. 2002. Home making: An architectural perspective. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 27 (3): 823-835. Williams, D.R. 2014. Making sense of "place": Reflections on pluralism and posi- tionality in place research. Landscape and Urban Planning, 131: 74""82. doi:10.1016/ . j.landurbplan.2014.08.002. 15 AOcrthc,ughfs on 1nultiscnsuriulUy and the hcritagc-1nobility nexus Noel B. ,\'alazar This edited volume is ground-breaking in multiple ways. The various con- tributions offer us many new insights. Rctther than rehashing these here, l want to focus on what I feel is still lacking in our discussions about multi- sensoriality and the heritage-mobility nexus. It is obvious that any academic analysis of the senses without a consideration of the body would be incom- plete. Most contributors to this volume do discuss the body and some also draw on the concept of embodiment. Such an approach is by now well established. Curiously, mainstream scholarship seems to neglect that the body is always a body-in-motion. As it moves, the body relates to its (changing) environment, which is captured in the notion of "emplacement" (Salazar 2023). Too much of our scientific (read: Western) understanding of the body is built upon models of the non-moving or even death body. Consideration of physical movement is key, even more so when the focus is on human mobi- lities. It is remarkable how little attention the physical body-in-motion receives in tourism studies or migration studies for instance. A publication such as the one at hand acknowledges this "heritage" and makes us aware of its limitations. Perception on the Move Classical and modem Western perspectives have considered body and mind as· separate entities,, valuing the latter as superior to the former. However, our understanding of (being in) the world is deeply rooted in our sensitive and sentient body (Abram 1996). All knowledge starts from personal experience, mediated through a sensate and kinaesthetic body. Moreover, our bodily experience is entangled with the sentience and experience of other species. In other words, "we" are individually and collectively entangled in a world of multitudinous· life - plants, other animals, places, ecosystems, and commu- nities, all of which are co-emergent and co-constitutive. Humans are living tissue amalgamated from various elements that temporarily constitute the human body, only to transform subsequently into other systems. If we sense that our being is "all planetary life", then the inextricable connectedness (both historically and contemporaneously) between life and non-life on this DOI: 10.4324/9781032713786~16 I r r I 1: ii I , I' iii 11:, ' 11 11 1111 ii ! I.! . i'! ii' ,, 1, ,, I 'i1,! I'll :11 ' 'i I I I r II J