International Journal of Mathematical Archive-7(4), 2016, 161-165 Available online through www.ijma.info ISSN 2229 – 5046 International Journal of Mathematical Archive- 7(4), April – 2016 161 ON EQUIVALENCE OF -NORMS AND THEIR DERIVED NORMS ON THE SPACE OF -SUMMABLE SEQUENCES PRADEEP KUMAR SINGH*, J. K. SRIVASTAVA Department of Mathematics and Statistics, D D U Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur – India, 273009. (Received On: 07-04-16; Revised & Accepted On: 30-04-16) ABSTRACT In this paper, we shall investigate equivalence relation between - and defined on ;1 ≤ < ∞. Moreover, we shall show that non-equivalent - can also give equivalent . Keywords: -summable sequences, parallel rearranged sequences, , - , , equivalence. AMS Subject Classification: 40A05, 46A45, 46B20, 46B45, 46B99. 1. INTRODUCTION The concept of 2- was initially investigated by Gähler [2] in the mid of 1960’s. Since then this theory has been developed in many directions including its generalization to - , for instance see Malćeski [7], Gunawan [1, 3, 4, 5, 6] and many others. Definition1.1: Let be a vector space over (= ℝ or ℂ ) of dimension ≥ (≥2). A non-negative real valued function ‖.,.,…,. ‖ defined on satisfying the four conditions: (N 1 ) ‖ , ,…, ‖ = 0 if and only if , ,…, are linearly dependent; (N 2 ) ‖ , ,…, ‖ is invariant under any permutation of , ,…, ; (N 3 ) ‖ , ,…, ‖ = ||‖ , ,…, ‖; (N 4 ) ‖ + , ,…, ‖ ≤ ‖ , ,…, ‖ + ‖, ,…, ‖; for all , ,…, , ∈ and for all ∈, is called an - on , and the pair ( , ‖.,.,…,. ‖) is called an - . Definition 1.2: Let ( , ‖.,.,…,. ‖) be an - . A sequence � � =0 ∞ in is said to be a Cauchy sequence if � − ′ , , ,..., − � → 0 as , ′ → ∞ for all , ,…, − ∈. � � =0 ∞ is said to be converges at ∈ ( is called limit point of the sequence) if � − , , ,..., − �→ 0 as → ∞ for all , ,…, − ∈ . An - ( , ‖.,.,…,. ‖) is called an - ( - ) if every Cauchy sequence in converges to an element of . A vector space can be equipped with several - , see [1]. In such a case, our aim is to investigate an equivalence relation between them. Definition 1.3: Two ‖ . ‖ 1 and ‖ . ‖ 2 defined on a linear space are said to be equivalent if there exists >0 and >0 such that: ‖‖ 1 ≤ ‖‖ 2 ≤ ‖‖ 1 for all ∈ . Similar to the above definition, two - ‖.,.,…,. ‖ 1 and ‖.,.,…,. ‖ 2 defined on a linear space are said to be equivalent if there exists >0 and >0 such that: ‖ , ,…, ‖ 1 ≤ ‖ , ,…, ‖ 2 ≤ ‖ , ,…, ‖ 1 for all , ,…, ∈ . -Norms which are not equivalent are termed as non-equivalent (or un-equivalent). Now we state the results of [6, 8] as following Lemma: Corresponding Author: Pradeep Kumar Singh*. E-mail: pradeep3789@gmail.com.