materials
Article
The Design and Development of Recycled Concretes in a
Circular Economy Using Mixed Construction and
Demolition Waste
Marcos Díaz González
1,
*, Pablo Plaza Caballero
2
, David Blanco Fernández
1
, Manuel Miguel Jordán Vidal
3
,
Isabel Fuencisla Sáez del Bosque
2
and César Medina Martínez
2
Citation: González, M.D.; Plaza
Caballero, P.; Fernández, D.B.; Jordán
Vidal, M.M.; del Bosque, I.F.S.;
Medina Martínez, C. The Design and
Development of Recycled Concretes
in a Circular Economy Using Mixed
Construction and Demolition Waste.
Materials 2021, 14, 4762. https://
doi.org/10.3390/ma14164762
Academic Editor: Jean-Marc Tulliani
Received: 5 July 2021
Accepted: 4 August 2021
Published: 23 August 2021
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral
with regard to jurisdictional claims in
published maps and institutional affil-
iations.
Copyright: © 2021 by the authors.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
4.0/).
1
Department of Construction Sciences, Metropolitan Technological University, Dieciocho,
Santiago de Chile 161, Chile; dblanco@utem.cl
2
Department of Construction, Research Institute for Sustainable Territorial Development (INTERRA),
University of Extremadura, 10003 Cáceres, Spain; pcaballerop@unex.es (P.P.C.); isaezdelu@unex.es (I.F.S.d.B.);
cmedinam@unex.es (C.M.M.)
3
Department of Agrochemistry and Environment, Miguel Hernández University of Elche, 03202 Elche, Spain;
manuel.jordan@umh.es
* Correspondence: mdiaz@utem.cl
Abstract: This research study analysed the effect of adding fine—fMRA (0.25% and 50%)—and
coarse—cMRA (0%, 25% and 50%)—mixed recycled aggregate both individually and simultaneously
in the development of sustainable recycled concretes that require a lower consumption of natural
resources. For this purpose, we first conducted a physical and mechanical characterisation of the
new recycled raw materials and then analysed the effect of its addition on fresh and hardened new
concretes. The results highlight that the addition of fMRA and/or cMRA does not cause a loss of
workability in the new concrete but does increase the amount of entrained air. Regarding compressive
strength, we observed that fMRA and/or cMRA cause a maximum increase of +12.4% compared
with conventional concrete. Tensile strength increases with the addition of fMRA (between 8.7% and
5.5%) and decreases with the use of either cMRA or fMRA + cMRA (between 4.6% and 7%). The
addition of fMRA mitigates the adverse effect that using cMRA has on tensile strength. Regarding
watertightness, all designed concretes have a structure that is impermeable to water. Lastly, the
results show the feasibility of using these concretes to design elements with a characteristic strength
of 25 MPa and that the optimal percentage of fMRA replacement is 25%.
Keywords: recycled concrete; recycled mixed sand; recycled mixed gravel; mechanical properties;
strength; watertightness
1. Introduction
Climate change and global warming have become important issues that directly
impact the world economy. This has led to countries developing laws and regulations that
control the emission of CO
2
and the appropriate management of waste. In this context,
the construction industry is responsible for 12% of all greenhouse gas emissions in the
European Union (EU) and for generating ~25–30% of the solid waste produced every year
in the EU [1], which equates to an average annual production of 800 million tonnes. In
addition, as many as 534 and 200 million tonnes of construction and demolition waste
(C&DW) are generated every year in the United States and China, respectively.
Concrete is the most used material in the construction sector worldwide, with the
EU and USA producing 165 and 150 million cubic metres, respectively, in 2018 [2]. This
industry is characterised by requiring large amounts of natural resources, as this material
is mainly composed of aggregates—60–75% of the volume of concrete—and, to a lesser
extent, cement—10–15%. Its manufacturing process is responsible for ~8% of the total
Materials 2021, 14, 4762. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14164762 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/materials