Citation: Hathout, R.M. Do
Polymeric Nanoparticles Really
Enhance the Bioavailability of Oral
Drugs? A Quantitative Answer
Using Meta-Analysis. Gels 2022, 8,
119. https://doi.org/10.3390/
gels8020119
Academic Editor: Alejandro Sosnik
Received: 30 January 2022
Accepted: 12 February 2022
Published: 14 February 2022
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral
with regard to jurisdictional claims in
published maps and institutional affil-
iations.
Copyright: © 2022 by the author.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
4.0/).
gels
Article
Do Polymeric Nanoparticles Really Enhance the Bioavailability
of Oral Drugs? A Quantitative Answer Using Meta-Analysis
Rania M. Hathout
Department of Pharmaceutics and Industrial Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ain Shams University,
Cairo 11566, Egypt; rania.hathout@pharma.asu.edu.eg or r_hathout@yahoo.com
Abstract: The oral route remains one of the most popular and important routes of administration for
drugs—one that warrants the development of advanced drug delivery systems, such as polymeric
nanoparticles capable of enhancing the absorption and bioavailability of the used drugs. In this work,
a systematic review of published works on several databases, followed by a meta-analysis, were
utilized in order to navigate the published studies and access literature-based evidence about the
capability of polymeric nanoparticulate systems to augment the absorption and bioavailability of
orally administered drugs. The pharmacokinetic parameter of the area under the curve (AUC) was
utilized as the “effect” of this meta-analytical study. The meta-analysis demonstrated a significant
increase in AUC compared to conventional formulations. Furthermore, comparing the synthetic
polymeric nanoparticles, versus their naturally-based administered counterparts, as subgroups of the
meta-analysis, revealed no significant differences.
Keywords: oral; drugs; nanoparticles; polymers; systematic; meta-analysis
1. Introduction
The oral route remains the most common route of drug administration and one of
the most convenient and acceptable to patients, due to its non-invasiveness and ease of
administration [1]. It is also preferred by the pharmaceutical industry due to the feasibility
of its mass production [2]. Several attempts have been made in order to enhance the
bioavailability of orally administered drugs and increase their absorption. Encapsulating
the drugs in different lipid and polymeric nanoparticles (NP) is one example of these
attempts [3,4]. Moreover, the delivery of drugs in a controlled manner is currently a topic
of great importance for both the industry and academia, due to its huge benefits for health-
care [5]. Recently, the use of lipid-based nano-carriers has shown proven superiority over
the conventional formulations in augmenting the bioavailability of oral drugs, via a study
using quantitative meta-analysis [6]. The close affinity of those carriers with the lipidic
nature of intestinal cell membranes may have contributed to this outcome. Consequently,
a logical question arises whether or not the use of polymeric nanoparticles increases the
bioavailability of the aforementioned drugs, bearing in mind their different nature and
more rigid matrices. From the pharmaceutical point of view, polymeric nanoparticles are
of special interest as they are more stable than other lipidic nanocarriers, such as liposomes,
and impart more protective effects to their internal cargo [7–9]. Furthermore, they are
distinguished by their facile modulation regarding their size, hydrophobicity, and surface
grafting and conjugation [10–13]. Accordingly, the same informatics tools of systematic
reviewing and meta-analysis are utilized in this study to answer this question.
Systematic reviewing deals with the synthesis of empirical evidence according to
pre-specified eligibility criteria, in order to address a specific research question. On the
one hand, this method is considered a qualitative informatics tool, while on the other
hand, meta-analysis is a quantitative synthesis tool [14]. Meta-analysis is an advanced
statistical method that integrates data extracted from multiple studies originating from
Gels 2022, 8, 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels8020119 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/gels